AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Expressive equivariant message passing

Analyze limits of message passing and build more powerful equivariant or subgraph GNNs.

109 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “message passing · equivariant · mpnns”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

36 papers in 2023–24 and 47 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 7.6% to 9.3%.

Open questions the data points to

What looks settled

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 4192020: 6202021: 7212022: 9222023: 17232024: 19242025: 21252026: 2626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

PROTEINS · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 75.192021: 76.32024: 79.86
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201975.19Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks (ICLR 2019 · 98 citations)
202176.3DropGNN: Random Dropouts Increase the Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2021 · 15 citations)
202479.86Boosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homology (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)

NCI1 · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 73.712022: 82.82024: 83.75
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201973.71Invariant and Equivariant Graph Networks (ICLR 2019 · 98 citations)
202282.8SpeqNets: Sparsity-aware permutation-equivariant graph networks (ICML 2022 · 0 citations)
202483.75Boosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homology (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)

Peptides-struct · MAE (lower is better)

6 papers, 2022–2025 · small gains only

2022: 0.252023: 0.2452025: 0.243
20222025
YearBest so farSet by
20220.25Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformer (NeurIPS 2022 · 228 citations)
20230.245A Generalization of ViT/MLP-Mixer to Graphs (ICML 2023 · 7 citations)
20250.243Sketch-Augmented Features Improve Learning Long-Range Dependencies in Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

Cora · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2025 · still improving

2021: 82.72025: 90.74
20212025
YearBest so farSet by
202182.7Elastic Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2021 · 5 citations)
202590.74GNNs Getting ComFy: Community and Feature Similarity Guided Rewiring (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Pubmed · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2025 · flat since 2024

2021: 79.42023: 90.46
20212025
YearBest so farSet by
202179.4Elastic Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2021 · 5 citations)
202390.46Tailoring Self-Attention for Graph via Rooted Subtrees (NeurIPS 2023 · 2 citations)

Citeseer · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2021–2025 · still improving

2021: 70.92025: 78.61
20212025
YearBest so farSet by
202170.9Elastic Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2021 · 5 citations)
202578.61Relieving the Over-Aggregating Effect in Graph Transformers (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What has been tried

74 papers here report 773 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 17%, mixed 7%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add reverse message passing to GINSynthetic degree-out · minority-class F143.58 -> 99.08HelpedProvably Powerful Graph Neural Networks for Directed Multigraphs (AAAI 2024 · 28 citations)
replace uniform neighbor aggregation with separate transformations for fraud and benign neighborsYelp, Amazon, and T-Finance · AUC89.38 -> 93.15; 93.16 -> 96.33; 95.05 -> 95.92HelpedPartitioning Message Passing for Graph Fraud Detection (ICLR 2024 · 7 citations)
Add resamplinggraph classification: NCI1, PROTEINS, ENZYMES, and IMDB-BINARY · accuracyDiffPool NCI1: 80.82 ± 1.71 -> 83.75 ± 1.70; PROTEINS: 77.89 ± 4.07 -> 79.86 ± 3.12HelpedBoosting Graph Pooling with Persistent Homology (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
add the flow encode moduleNAS-Bench-101 · Kendall's Tau (×100)42.5 (1.6) -> 86.1 (0.8)HelpedFlowerFormer: Empowering Neural Architecture Encoding using a Flow-aware Graph Transformer (CVPR 2024 · 5 citations)
Replace α-entmax sampling with Gumbel Top-kHomophilic and heterophilic datasets · accuracyHurtFrom Latent Graph to Latent Topology Inference: Differentiable Cell Complex Module (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add spatial antisymmetry (use beta instead of beta=0)Peptides-func · average precision61.95 (±00.67) -> 63.13 (±0.46)HelpedOn Oversquashing in Graph Neural Networks Through the Lens of Dynamical Systems (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Use a sum-aggregation action network instead of a mean-aggregation action networkRootNeighbors · MAE0.339 -> 0.079HelpedCooperative Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Add LapPE to GCN+DegreeTopology Far-OOD · accuracy33.67 ± 3.56 -> 55.00 ± 3.08HelpedThe Underappreciated Power of Vision Models for Graph Structural Understanding (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Add k-hop aggregation to SSM dynamicsGraphProp Diameter, SSSP, and Eccentricity · log10(MSE)Diameter: -2.431 -> -3.075; SSSP: -2.821 -> -3.604; Eccentricity: -2.245 -> -4.265HelpedOn Vanishing Gradients, Over-Smoothing, and Over-Squashing in GNNs: Bridging Recurrent and Graph Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
add identity filtration (VC-I)ZINC · MAE0.1878 ±\textcolor{gray}{0.012} -> 0.1432 ±\textcolor{gray}{0.023}HelpedPositional Encoding meets Persistent Homology on Graphs (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use joint density estimation over all layer representations rather than estimating density from one layer at a timeAmazon Ratings and Roman Empire, LoC · AUC-ROCHelpedUncertainty Estimation for Heterophilic Graphs Through the Lens of Information Theory (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase the training label ratioCSBM and Cora · accuracynullHelpedA Signed Graph Approach to Understanding and Mitigating Oversmoothing (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 28 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Cora · 8 of 28 papers
  • amazon-ratings · 5 of 28 papers
  • PubMed · 5 of 28 papers
  • PROTEINS · 5 of 28 papers
  • Citeseer · 5 of 28 papers
  • Peptides-struct · 4 of 28 papers
  • ZINC · 4 of 28 papers
  • roman-empire · 4 of 28 papers

Baselines

  • GCN · 11 of 28 papers
  • GIN · 8 of 28 papers
  • GAT · 7 of 28 papers
  • GraphSAGE · 6 of 28 papers
  • GPS · 4 of 28 papers
  • GCNII · 3 of 28 papers
  • SignNet · 3 of 28 papers
  • SPE · 3 of 28 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 83 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy