AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Structural GNN variants

Develop new graph architectures using geometry, trees, templates, and commute-time structure.

65 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “message passing · equivariant · mpnns”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 4 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 21 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 6.1% to 4.1%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: ZINC (MAE, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 3202021: 7212022: 5222023: 11232024: 18242025: 15252026: 626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Citeseer · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 73.72024: 77.332025: 81.88
20232025

Cora · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 84.92024: 87.932025: 90.82
20232025

PubMed · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 89.032024: 89.962025: 91.36
20232025

CS · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 94.212024: 95.512025: 96.58
20232025

Photo · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2023: 94.382024: 96.11
20232025
YearBest so farSet by
202394.38Graph Ordering Attention Networks (AAAI 2023 · 36 citations)
202496.11Polynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Time (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)

ZINC · MAE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 0.2422022: 0.1362024: 0.063
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
20210.242Rethinking Graph Neural Architecture Search From Message-Passing (CVPR 2021 · 49 citations)
20220.136Automatic Relation-Aware Graph Network Proliferation (CVPR 2022 · 9 citations)
20240.063Graph As Point Set (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What has been tried

56 papers here report 606 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 24%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Include demands reconstructed by the physics-informed algorithm as input node featuresWDS experiments · performanceNo clear effectPhysics-Informed Graph Neural Networks for Water Distribution Systems (AAAI 2024 · 28 citations)
Add principal graph learning in place of complete-graph learningAmazon recommendation datasets · Recall@20HelpedMind Individual Information! Principal Graph Learning for Multimedia Recommendation (AAAI 2025 · 25 citations)
Add neighbor node featuresogbl-ppa · Hits@100 (%)63.22±1.74 -> 61.88±4.33HurtStructural Information Enhanced Graph Representation for Link Prediction (AAAI 2024 · 20 citations)
Increase maximum degree from 1 to 65-body · MSE (× 10⁻²)0.52 -> 0.69HurtAre High-Degree Representations Really Unnecessary in Equivariant Graph Neural Networks? (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
Use neighborhood-based masked attention instead of adjacency-based masking or unmasked full attentionCora, Citeseer, Pubmed, Arxiv · AccuracyCora: 83.12 ± 0.24, 83.41 ± 0.38 -> 84.03 ± 0.15; Citeseer: 71.13 ± 0.35, 72.45 ± 0.33 -> 73.15 ± 0.18; Pubmed: 83.41 ±HelpedNLGT: Neighborhood-based and Label-enhanced Graph Transformer Framework for Node Classification (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
remove PCBA_1328 from pretrainingdownstream tasks · performanceHurtOn the Scalability of GNNs for Molecular Graphs (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
add ReLU activationogbn-arxiv · accuracy71.82 -> 73.46HelpedPolynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Time (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
Stack two message-passing layers rather than use the one-step NRI baselineSpring, ER-50, δt=20 · AUC99.84±0.47 -> 51.01±0.64HurtA Graph Dynamics Prior for Relational Inference (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Add equivariant matrix features (L=1) instead of invariant features (L=0)Cumulene dihedral-angle scan · energy trend captureHelpedEquivariant Matrix Function Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Replace standard heterogeneous GNN message passing with atomic routes, using GraphSAGE-style aggregationRelBench classification, regression, and recommendation tasks · task performanceHelpedRelGNN: Composite Message Passing for Relational Deep Learning (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
reduce diffusion length from the full schedule to 10 or 5 diffusion stepsBendingBeam, ImpactPlate, and DeformingPlate · displacement RMSEHurtDiffusion-Based Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks for Simulating Nonlinear Solid Mechanics (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
pre-train with G²PM rather than use G²PM without pre-trainingogbn-arxiv · accuracy69.64 ± 0.08 -> 72.31 ± 0.07HelpedGenerative Graph Pattern Machine (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 16 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Citeseer · 6 of 16 papers
  • Cora · 5 of 16 papers
  • Pubmed · 5 of 16 papers
  • Roman-Empire · 4 of 16 papers
  • Ogbn-Arxiv · 2 of 16 papers
  • Squirrel · 2 of 16 papers
  • Chameleon · 2 of 16 papers
  • AM-Photo · 2 of 16 papers

Baselines

  • GCN · 8 of 16 papers
  • GAT · 7 of 16 papers
  • GIN · 5 of 16 papers
  • GraphSAGE · 4 of 16 papers
  • DirGNN · 3 of 16 papers
  • MLP · 3 of 16 papers
  • GraphGPS · 2 of 16 papers
  • Exphormer · 2 of 16 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy