AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Graph rewiring and scalable message passing

Rewire graphs and add virtual nodes to improve message passing.

72 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “message passing · equivariant · mpnns”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Leveling off Several papers from 2025–26 still report on 6 tracked benchmarks, but the best result has barely moved since 2024.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 28 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 6.1% to 5.5%.

What looks settled

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 4202021: 2212022: 8222023: 12232024: 17242025: 18252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Citeseer · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2022–2025 · flat since 2024

2022: 73.32023: 77.31
20222025

Mutag · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2022–2025 · flat since 2024

2022: 91.52024: 98.4
20222025
YearBest so farSet by
202291.5Self-Supervised Graph Neural Networks via Diverse and Interactive Message Passing (AAAI 2022 · 14 citations)
202498.4Probabilistically Rewired Message-Passing Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)

Proteins · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2023–2025 · flat since 2024

2023: 75.782024: 80.7
20232025
YearBest so farSet by
202375.78Understanding Oversquashing in GNNs through the Lens of Effective Resistance (ICML 2023 · 5 citations)
202480.7Probabilistically Rewired Message-Passing Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)

Cora · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2022–2025 · flat since 2024

2022: 83.32023: 88.37
20222025

Chameleon · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2023–2025 · flat since 2024

2023: 72.282024: 75.2
20232025

Collab · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2023–2025 · flat since 2024

2023: 77.452024: 86.72
20232025
YearBest so farSet by
202377.45Understanding Oversquashing in GNNs through the Lens of Effective Resistance (ICML 2023 · 5 citations)
202486.72Towards Dynamic Message Passing on Graphs (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)

What has been tried

53 papers here report 552 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 20%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
replace Transformer layers with TextGINConvRestaurant, Laptop, Twitter · Accuracy85.17 -> 80.07; 78.64 -> 74.68; 76.51 -> 74.89HurtTextGT: A Double-View Graph Transformer on Text for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (AAAI 2024 · 49 citations)
add unified smoothing to label smoothingCora, L/C=20 · ECE (M=20)% -> 0.0715HelpedModerate Message Passing Improves Calibration: A Universal Way to Mitigate Confidence Bias in Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Use the Simple gradient estimator rather than Gumbel SoftSub-ST or I-MLEZinc - Edge · MAE0.153 ±0.003; 0.151 ±0.001 -> 0.139 ±0.001HelpedProbabilistically Rewired Message-Passing Neural Networks (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Use MPLP+ walk-level features instead of MPLP node-level structural featuresUSAir, NS, PB, Yeast, C.ele, Power, Router, E.coli · Hits@50MixedPure Message Passing Can Estimate Common Neighbor for Link Prediction (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Use proximity measurement instead of attentionthree graph-classification benchmarks (datasets unnamed in excerpt) · performanceHelpedTowards Dynamic Message Passing on Graphs (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Remove contribution adjustment from GAttCora, Citeseer, and Pubmed · Pearson correlation for Δ_PC0.8477 -> 0.7708; 0.8624 -> 0.6392; 0.8516 -> 0.8058; 0.8711 -> 0.6671; 0.8812 -> 0.7683; 0.8489 -> 0.4197HurtFaithful and Accurate Self-Attention Attribution for Message Passing Neural Networks via the Computation Tree Viewpoint (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
add learnable boundary coefficients instead of fixed constantsCS · ACC (%)94.14 ± 0.26 -> 95.78 ± 0.21HelpedDeeper with Riemannian Geometry: Overcoming Oversmoothing and Oversquashing for Graph Foundation Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Use centrality-based node expansion instead of random node expansionReddit-Binary · accuracy72.000\std{0.850} -> 80.690\std{0.721}HelpedPANDA: Expanded Width-Aware Message Passing Beyond Rewiring (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Use aggressive bounds tightening instead of static bounds tighteningCora · avg-time (s)0.17 -> 0.46HurtVerifying message-passing neural networks via topology-based bounds tightening (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Use two sampled virtual nodes instead of one fully connected virtual nodeZINC · MAE0.074 ±0.002 -> 0.067 ±0.001HelpedProbabilistic Graph Rewiring via Virtual Nodes (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Remove gradients from the additional message-passing termsYelp-2018, Gowalla, Amazon-book · NDCG@206.36 -> 6.16; 9.88 -> 9.87; 8.13 -> 7.80HurtHow Does Message Passing Improve Collaborative Filtering? (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
add hierarchical positional encodingPATTERN · accuracy0.8511 -> 0.8738HelpedBest of Both Worlds: Advantages of Hybrid Graph Sequence Models (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 21 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Cora · 7 of 21 papers
  • Citeseer · 7 of 21 papers
  • Pubmed · 5 of 21 papers
  • Peptides-Func · 5 of 21 papers
  • Texas · 4 of 21 papers
  • Wisconsin · 4 of 21 papers
  • peptides-struct · 4 of 21 papers
  • Cornell · 3 of 21 papers

Baselines

  • GCN · 10 of 21 papers
  • GIN · 5 of 21 papers
  • Exphormer · 5 of 21 papers
  • GAT · 5 of 21 papers
  • GatedGCN · 4 of 21 papers
  • GRIT · 4 of 21 papers
  • GraphGPS · 3 of 21 papers
  • GINE · 3 of 21 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 57 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy