atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

From Latent Graph to Latent Topology Inference: Differentiable Cell Complex Module

ICLR 2024 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Expressive equivariant message passing · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces Latent Topology Inference via the Differentiable Cell Complex Module (DCM), which learns sparse, non-regular cell complexes (graph plus polygons) with alpha-entmax sampling and trains them end-to-end with GNN/cell complex message passing for node classification.

Problem

Latent graph inference methods only learn regular graph topologies and need an input graph, while topological deep learning relies on fixed deterministic lifts and exhaustive, unscalable cell search when no graph is given.

Approach

A two-step differentiable procedure: an alpha-entmax-based graph module (alpha-DGM) samples sparse, non-regular edges, then a Polygon Inference Module samples polygons among induced cycles, with a reward-based loss that lets the downstream task loss guide edge and polygon selection.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DCM rather than latent graph inference with the input graph on TexasDCM vs DGM-M · Texas, w graphaccuracy: 62.78 $\pm$ 9.31 -> 84.87 $\pm$ 10.04Helped
Use DCM rather than latent graph inference without the input graph on TexasDCM vs DGM-M · Texas, w/o graphaccuracy: 81.67 $\pm$ 7.05 -> 85.71 $\pm$ 7.87Helped
Replace α-entmax sampling with Gumbel Top-k (ablation)DCM · Homophilic and heterophilic datasetsaccuracyHurt
Set α=1 and take all polygons (ablation)DCM · Homophilic and heterophilic datasetsaccuracyNo clear effect
Vary the number of message-passing layers from 1 to 2–4 (ablation)DCM · Homophilic and heterophilic datasetsaccuracyMixed
Vary maximum cycle length Kmax from 4 to 3 or 5 (ablation)DCM · Homophilic and heterophilic datasetsaccuracyMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Physics CS Texas Wisconsin Squirrel Chameleon

Benchmarks: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Physics CS Texas Wisconsin Squirrel Chameleon

Metrics: test accuracy (avg over 10 splits) homophily level

Baselines: MLP GCN DGM-E DGM-M Top-k DCM

Builds on: Differentiable Graph Module (DGM) alpha-entmax cell complex neural networks GCN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy