AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Theory of graph convolutional networks

Analyze convergence and transferability of graph convolutional networks on random graphs.

83 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “convolutional · gcns · spectral”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 15 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.9% to 3.0%.

No longer reported by papers here: NCI1 (accuracy (%), last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 5182019: 5192020: 8202021: 7212022: 14222023: 12232024: 11242025: 8252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

NCI1 · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2016–2022 · not reported since 2022

2016: 78.592022: 81.9
20162022
YearBest so farSet by
201678.59Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphs (ICML 2016 · 808 citations)
202281.9Capturing Graphs with Hypo-Elliptic Diffusions (NeurIPS 2022 · 0 citations)

What has been tried

68 papers here report 683 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 20%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove the identified biased subgraphs without performing stage twoNBA, Pokec-z, and Pokec-n · ∆SPHelpedGenerating Diagnostic and Actionable Explanations for Fair Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
add pointwise and coupled reaction componentsCora-ML, 1% seeds · average total influence (%)9.7 -> 11.5HelpedDeepSN: A Sheaf Neural Framework for Influence Maximization (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)
add stochastic path dropout decayImageNet-100 · Top-1 accuracy81.89 -> 84.36HelpedHypergraph Vision Transformers: Images are More than Nodes, More than Edges (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
Replace linear similarity sampling with Gaussian similarity samplingCiteSeer · accuracy67.23±0.23 -> 69.19±0.14HelpedNeural Gaussian Similarity Modeling for Differential Graph Structure Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Add information bottleneck (IB) optimization to multi-scale condensationCiteseer, multiple target reduction scales · accuracy consistency across scalesHelpedBi-Directional Multi-Scale Graph Dataset Condensation via Information Bottleneck (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
use joint product-graph learning instead of sequential TTSMetrLA H=12 · MAE3.67 -> 3.44HelpedContinuous Product Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
add the label networkMIRFlickr · mAP (32 bits)0.859 -> 0.871HelpedDeep Graph Online Hashing for Multi-Label Image Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
Multiply the learned threshold parameter by 0.1synthetic sparse precision matrix recovery · convergence0.1HelpedSchur's Positive-Definite Network: Deep Learning in the SPD cone with structure (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Add BAMUndirected graph estimation, Chebyshev dependencies · loss0.202 ± 0.005 -> 0.173 ± 0.007HelpedGraph Structure Inference with BAM: Neural Dependency Processing via Bilinear Attention (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add L1 regularization to the WILT edge-weight objectiveMutagenicity · RMSEHurtWILTing Trees: Interpreting the Distance Between MPNN Embeddings (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add shortcut connections to the unsupervised embeddingsNCI1 · accuracy76.5 -> 76.6HelpedTractable Probabilistic Graph Representation Learning with Graph-Induced Sum-Product Networks (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
use random layer-wise asynchronous updates instead of synchronous forward/backward sweepsMNIST · accuracy (%)98.16±0.03% -> 98.11±0.04%No clear effectLearning in Deep Factor Graphs with Gaussian Belief Propagation (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
GCNCoraaccuracy81.5 – 87.172 papers, e.g. ICLR 2019 and CVPR 2018

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 9 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • GCN · 2 of 9 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 38 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy