AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Weisfeiler-Leman expressivity hierarchies

Characterize GNN expressive power with WL-style hierarchies.

66 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “wl · expressive · power”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 32 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.2% to 6.3%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 2202021: 7212022: 5222023: 5232024: 15242025: 15252026: 1726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

36 papers here report 294 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 17%, mixed 9%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
replace general graph canonization with universal graph canonization (UGC) on GINMayo, RosMap, Cancer, fMRI-ABIDE · accuracyMayo 0.483 (GC) -> 0.624 (UGC); RosMap 0.486 -> 0.701; Cancer 0.539 -> 0.714; fMRI-ABIDE 0.610 -> 0.648HelpedRethinking the Power of Graph Canonization in Graph Representation Learning with Stability (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase the selected subgraph count from T=2 to T=5ZINC-12k test · MAE0.120±0.003 -> 0.109±0.005HelpedEfficient Subgraph GNNs by Learning Effective Selection Policies (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Use multiple magnetic potentials instead of the best single potentialDirected acyclic graphs · spd RMSE0.124 (± 0.002) -> 0.016 (± 0.000)HelpedWhat Are Good Positional Encodings for Directed Graphs? (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
add trainingBREC total · pairs distinguished80 -> 222HelpedAn Empirical Study of Realized GNN Expressiveness (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
add RRWP positional encodingsZinc (12K) · MAE0.062 ±0.004 -> 0.059 ±0.004HelpedTowards Principled Graph Transformers (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Vary the number of message-passing layers from 1 to 8tgbl-wiki · MRRHelpedExpressive Power of Temporal Message Passing (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
add t=1 composition atoms to R-GNNLogistics · coverage45 % -> 100 %HelpedLearning More Expressive General Policies for Classical Planning Domains (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
add l1-normalization in the last layergraph classification benchmarks · generalization gapHelpedTowards Bridging Generalization and Expressivity of Graph Neural Networks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Pre-train (2,1) + LPE rather than train from scratchAlchemy (12K) · MAE0.124 ± 0.001 -> 0.101 ± 0.001HelpedAligning Transformers with Weisfeiler-Leman (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
add Tinhofer individualization to EGONN ego-netsC4, C5, and K2,3 induced-subgraph identification on 3-regular graphs · test accuracy73.6 ±10.2 -> 99.6 ±0.5; 89.4 ±1.5 -> 99.6 ±0.8; 74.2 ±2.2 -> 100.0 ±0.0HelpedOn the Expressivity and Sample Complexity of Node-Individualized Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
prune K-PathMUTAG · accuracy91.7±1.7 -> 92.6 ±3.3HelpedPruning for GNNs: Lower Complexity with Comparable Expressiveness (ICML 2025)
Increase distance encoding depth from 0 to 5CSL · accuracy50 ± 0 -> 100 ± 0HelpedThe Expressive Power of Path-Based Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 16 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MUTAG · 3 of 16 papers
  • PROTEINS · 3 of 16 papers
  • ZINC · 3 of 16 papers
  • QM9 · 2 of 16 papers
  • Cora · 2 of 16 papers
  • Citeseer · 2 of 16 papers
  • Pubmed · 2 of 16 papers
  • ENZYMES · 2 of 16 papers

Baselines

  • GIN · 4 of 16 papers
  • GCN · 4 of 16 papers
  • GraphSAGE · 2 of 16 papers
  • GAT · 2 of 16 papers
  • SignNet · 2 of 16 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 52 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy