atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / RNNs and normalization

Towards Precise Scaling Laws for Video Diffusion Transformers

CVPR 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › RNNs and normalization · approach: Neural scaling laws · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Derives scaling laws for video diffusion transformers that predict optimal batch size and learning rate as functions of model size and training tokens, then uses optimal hyperparameters to fit more precise model-size and loss scaling laws.

Problem

Video diffusion transformers are very costly to train, and existing LLM-style scaling laws ignore hyperparameter choice (batch size, learning rate), which makes predictions of optimal model size and loss imprecise for video generation.

Approach

Model optimal batch size and learning rate as power laws in training tokens and model size (derived from SGD convergence analysis), then fit model-size/compute and loss scaling laws only under these optimal hyperparameters, showing fixed suboptimal hyperparameters distort the fits.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the optimal-hyperparameter scaling law instead of fixed suboptimal hyperparameters (ablation)Video DiT scaling law · Validation setmean squared error: 4.31 ⇥ 10−7 -> 2.35 ⇥ 10−7Helped
Use optimal hyperparameters to predict optimal model size (ablation)Video DiT scaling law · Optimal model size vs compute budgetslope deviation: 30.26% -> 3.57%Helped
Use the optimal-hyperparameter scaling law rather than fixed suboptimal hyperparameters (ablation)Video DiT at a compute budget of 1 × 10¹⁰ TFlops · Validation setinference cost: 40.1%Helped
Use optimal hyperparameters rather than fixed suboptimal hyperparametersVideo DiT · Validation setvalidation loss: 0.5403 vs. 0.5071Helped
Use optimal hyperparameters rather than fixed suboptimal hyperparametersVideo DiT · Validation setvalidation loss: 0.03% and 0.15%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: private video dataset (partitioned into train and validation)

Benchmarks: validation loss

Metrics: validation loss MSE of fit predicted optimal model size error VBench aesthetic score

Baselines: Chinchilla scaling law DeepSeek scaling law OpenAI scaling law fixed suboptimal hyperparameter scaling

Builds on: Chinchilla scaling law DeepSeek scaling law OpenAI scaling law

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy