AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Multimodal fusion with missing modalities

Learns aligned multimodal representations robust to missing or imbalanced modalities.

208 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Cross-modal learning, keyword cluster “fusion · missing · multi modal”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Leveling off Several papers from 2025–26 still report on 6 tracked benchmarks, but the best result has barely moved since 2024.

52 papers in 2023–24 and 126 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 17.9% to 16.0%.

What looks settled

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 3172018: 4182019: 3192020: 4202021: 5212022: 10222023: 20232024: 32242025: 40252026: 8626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CREMA-D · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2023–2025 · flat since 2024

2023: 61.82024: 79.82
20232025
YearBest so farSet by
202361.8PMR: Prototypical Modal Rebalance for Multimodal Learning (CVPR 2023 · 136 citations)
202479.82ReconBoost: Boosting Can Achieve Modality Reconcilement (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)

CMU-MOSI · F1 (higher is better)

7 papers, 2024–2025 · flat since 2024

2024: 88.6
20242025
YearBest so farSet by
202488.6Neuro-Inspired Information-Theoretic Hierarchical Perception for Multimodal Learning (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)

CMU-MOSI · Corr (higher is better)

6 papers, 2024–2025 · flat since 2024

2024: 0.852
20242025
YearBest so farSet by
20240.852Neuro-Inspired Information-Theoretic Hierarchical Perception for Multimodal Learning (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)

CMU-MOSI · MAE (lower is better)

5 papers, 2024–2025 · flat since 2024

2024: 0.643
20242025
YearBest so farSet by
20240.643Neuro-Inspired Information-Theoretic Hierarchical Perception for Multimodal Learning (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)

Food101 · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2025 · flat since 2024

2018: 90.82024: 93.332025: 93.46
20182025

MIMIC · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2025 · flat since 2024

2021: 78.2
20212025
YearBest so farSet by
202178.2MultiBench: Multiscale Benchmarks for Multimodal Representation Learning (NeurIPS 2021 · 22 citations)

What has been tried

114 papers here report 1,252 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 16%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Train on multiple datasets with sensor-specific tokens and batch sampling rather than the baseline setupTouch and Go · accuracy (%)21.4 -> 52.7HelpedBinding Touch to Everything: Learning Unified Multimodal Tactile Representations (CVPR 2024 · 57 citations)
add head gradient modificationCREMA-D · accuracy66.32 -> 74.51HelpedMultimodal Representation Learning by Alternating Unimodal Adaptation (CVPR 2024 · 54 citations)
Add SUFA to RMFINoisy MVSA-Single, Salt-Pepper ϵ = 10 · Acc59.11 ± 1.92 -> 61.04 ± 1.31HelpedEmbracing Unimodal Aleatoric Uncertainty for Robust Multimodal Fusion (CVPR 2024 · 50 citations)
use Laplace rather than Softmax gatingMIMIC-IV 25-PHE · AUROC70.54 ± 0.47 -> 71.23 ± 0.53HelpedFuseMoE: Mixture-of-Experts Transformers for Fleximodal Fusion (NeurIPS 2024 · 43 citations)
Randomly re-sample all modalities at the same frequency instead of contribution-targeted re-samplingKinetics Sounds · Acc66.92 -> 64.69HurtEnhancing Multimodal Cooperation via Sample-level Modality Valuation (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
use multimodal multitask pretraining instead of unimodal pretrainingiNaturalist-2018 · top-1 accuracy74.2 -> 90.3HelpedOmniVec2 - A Novel Transformer based Network for Large Scale Multimodal and Multitask Learning (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
add similarity-based modality alignment instead of temporal CTC alignmentMIntRec · ACC (%)73.15 -> 73.62HelpedToken-Level Contrastive Learning with Modality-Aware Prompting for Multimodal Intent Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 36 citations)
Add GMD to DSBraTS, average across missing-modality counts · DICE61.5 -> 70.7HelpedGradient-Guided Modality Decoupling for Missing-Modality Robustness (AAAI 2024 · 22 citations)
Add expert specializationADNI, IGC B (full modalities) · ACC62.75 -> 66.11HelpedFlex-MoE: Modeling Arbitrary Modality Combination via the Flexible Mixture-of-Experts (NeurIPS 2024 · 16 citations)
add relative advantage aware supervision regulationIEMOCAP, imbalanced missing rates · F10.5696 -> 0.5999; 0.5599 -> 0.6109HelpedRedCore: Relative Advantage Aware Cross-Modal Representation Learning for Missing Modalities with Imbalanced Missing Rates (AAAI 2024 · 15 citations)
extend Joint training from 50 epochs to 100 epochsCREMA-D · Accuracy35.14 -> 35.36No clear effectAdaptive Unimodal Regulation for Balanced Multimodal Information Acquisition (CVPR 2025 · 13 citations)
Use multi-channel retrieval rather than cross-modal retrievalMM-IMDb, 70% text missing · F1-M52.37 -> 55.16HelpedRetrieval-Augmented Dynamic Prompt Tuning for Incomplete Multimodal Learning (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 62 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CREMA-D · 12 of 62 papers
  • CMU-MOSI · 10 of 62 papers
  • CMU-MOSEI · 6 of 62 papers
  • MM-IMDb · 6 of 62 papers
  • MSR-VTT · 5 of 62 papers
  • AV-MNIST · 4 of 62 papers
  • Kinetics Sounds · 4 of 62 papers
  • UR-FUNNY · 4 of 62 papers

Baselines

  • CLIP · 7 of 62 papers
  • OGM-GE · 6 of 62 papers
  • PMR · 5 of 62 papers
  • OGM · 5 of 62 papers
  • MMPareto · 5 of 62 papers
  • MulT · 4 of 62 papers
  • AGM · 4 of 62 papers
  • LanguageBind · 4 of 62 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 178 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy