AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Probabilistic embeddings for cross-modal retrieval

Matches images and text using probabilistic, multi-embedding or generative-aided representations.

108 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Cross-modal learning, keyword cluster “cross · retrieval · image text”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 48 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.2% to 6.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 2172018: 2182019: 6192020: 8202021: 13212022: 7222023: 9232024: 12242025: 14252026: 3426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

MS-COCO 5K · rSum (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 416.52023: 450.9
20202025

What has been tried

72 papers here report 793 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 81%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 14%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add UMFRSTPReid · R@168.15 -> 69.55HelpedAdaptive Uncertainty-Based Learning for Text-Based Person Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 52 citations)
Add CSA alignmentMSCOCO · RSUM425.7 -> 429.7HelpedCross-Modal and Uni-Modal Soft-Label Alignment for Image-Text Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 44 citations)
Add MUMRSTPReid · Rank-1 accuracy59.80 -> 62.35HelpedUnifying Multi-Modal Uncertainty Modeling and Semantic Alignment for Text-to-Image Person Re-identification (AAAI 2024 · 39 citations)
Add partial OTFlickr30K, MRate 0.6 · Image-to-Text R@162.2 -> 65.1HelpedLearning to Rematch Mismatched Pairs for Robust Cross-Modal Retrieval (CVPR 2024 · 38 citations)
Add the Reverse-Query objectiveFashionIQ validation · R@119.98 -> 20.69HelpedData Roaming and Quality Assessment for Composed Image Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 36 citations)
Add the style intervenerCUHK-PEDES · Rank-164.04 -> 65.23HelpedCausality-Inspired Invariant Representation Learning for Text-Based Person Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 31 citations)
add feature optimization to the generated pseudo-image feature baselineMSCOCO in-domain · CIDEr88.5 -> 89.8HelpedImproving Cross-Modal Alignment with Synthetic Pairs for Text-Only Image Captioning (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
apply data cleaning to generated dialoguesChatPedes test · R-173.72 -> 75.67HelpedChat-based Person Retrieval via Dialogue-Refined Cross-Modal Alignment (CVPR 2025 · 13 citations)
add multi-level alignment (instance-level plus word-level)Multi30K · SumR473.2 -> 490.0; 482.3 -> 493.0; 472.6 -> 480.4HelpedCL2CM: Improving Cross-Lingual Cross-Modal Retrieval via Cross-Lingual Knowledge Transfer (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
Add consistency learning loss LclNUS-WIDE-10K · mAP@all (Avg.)0.586 -> 0.598HelpedFuzzy Multimodal Learning for Trusted Cross-modal Retrieval (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)
Add R-GCN spatial visual encodingTWITTER-2015 and TWITTER-2017 test · F175.07 -> 76.49; 86.05 -> 87.13HelpedHierarchical Aligned Multimodal Learning for NER on Tweet Posts (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
add concept decomposition and its associated loss functionsQVHighlights val split · R1@0.559.35 -> 62.19HelpedCDTR: Semantic Alignment for Video Moment Retrieval Using Concept Decomposition Transformer (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MS-COCO · 6 of 17 papers
  • Flickr30K · 6 of 17 papers
  • Wikipedia · 2 of 17 papers
  • INRIA-Websearch · 2 of 17 papers
  • XMediaNet · 2 of 17 papers
  • MSRVTT · 2 of 17 papers
  • CUHK-PEDES · 2 of 17 papers
  • M-BEIR · 2 of 17 papers

Baselines

  • SCAN · 3 of 17 papers
  • VSE∞ · 2 of 17 papers
  • SGRAF · 2 of 17 papers
  • NAAF · 2 of 17 papers
  • MCCA · 2 of 17 papers
  • SCL · 2 of 17 papers
  • CLIP-SF · 2 of 17 papers
  • BLIP-FF · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 69 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy