atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Embracing Unimodal Aleatoric Uncertainty for Robust Multimodal Fusion

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Multimodal fusion with missing modalities · 50 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Embracing Aleatoric Uncertainty (EAU), a multimodal fusion method that models unimodal aleatoric uncertainty with Gaussian embeddings, uses it in contrastive learning for stable unimodal features, and applies a VIB-based compression for robust joint representations.

Problem

Multimodal fusion degrades when unimodal data contain noise (aleatoric uncertainty), which corrupts cross-modal interactions and hurts robustness.

Approach

Represent each unimodal sample as a multivariate Gaussian whose variance captures aleatoric uncertainty, use the variance for uncertainty-based contrastive augmentation (SUFA), then fuse with uncertainty-weighted attention and compress the joint representation with a variational information bottleneck (RMFI).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply EAU fusionmultimodal sentiment analysis · CMU-MOSIAcc7: 48.6 -> 48.8Helped
Apply EAU fusionmultimodal sentiment analysis · CMU-MOSEIAcc7: 54.9 -> 54.8No clear effect
Apply EAU fusionmultimodal image classification · MVSA-SingleAcc: 78.50 -> 79.15Helped
Apply EAU fusionmultimodal image classification · Food-101Acc: 92.92 -> 93.20Helped
Apply EAU fusionmultimodal image classification · NYU Depth v2Acc: 71.06 -> 72.05Helped
Apply EAU fusionnoisy multimodal input · Noisy NYU Depth v2, Gaussian ϵ = 10Acc: 55.60 -> 58.85Helped
Add SUFA to RMFI (ablation)EAU on noisy MVSA-Single · Noisy MVSA-Single, Salt-Pepper ϵ = 10Acc: 59.11 ± 1.92 -> 61.04 ± 1.31Helped
Replace Late Fusion with RMFI (ablation)SUFA on noisy MVSA-Single · Noisy MVSA-Single, Salt-Pepper ϵ = 10Acc: 55.93 ± 2.25 -> 61.04 ± 1.31Helped
Replace Concat with RMFI (ablation)SUFA on noisy MVSA-Single · Noisy MVSA-Single, Salt-Pepper ϵ = 10Acc: 60.67 ± 1.38 -> 61.04 ± 1.31Helped
Add audio modality to text (ablation)EAU on CMU-MOSI · CMU-MOSIAcc7: 44.1 -> 46.7Helped
Add video modality to text (ablation)EAU on CMU-MOSI · CMU-MOSIAcc: 76.30 -> 79.15Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CMU-MOSI CMU-MOSEI MVSA-Single UPMC Food101 NYU Depth v2

Benchmarks: CMU-MOSI CMU-MOSEI MVSA-Single UPMC Food101 NYU Depth v2

Metrics: Acc7 F1 Pearson correlation accuracy

Baselines: MIB HMA MIM GCNet ConFEDE DiCMoR DMD MMBT TMC ITIN PMF MVCN

Builds on: QMF Variational Information Bottleneck dynamic multimodal fusion MMBT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy