AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Cross-modal hashing

Learns compact binary codes for efficient cross-modal retrieval.

45 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Cross-modal learning, keyword cluster “cross · retrieval · image text”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

5 papers in 2023–24 and 25 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 1.7% to 3.2%.

No longer reported by papers here: MIRFlickr, image→text, 16 bits (MAP, last in 2020); NUS-WIDE, image→text, 16 bits (MAP, last in 2020); NUS-WIDE, text→image, 16 bits (MAP, last in 2020).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 6172018: 2182019: 2192020: 1202021: 1212022: 1222023: 1232024: 4242025: 8252026: 1726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

MIRFlickr, image→text, 16 bits · MAP (higher is better)

4 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 0.7132019: 0.772
20172020
YearBest so farSet by
20170.713Pairwise Relationship Guided Deep Hashing for Cross-Modal Retrieval (AAAI 2017 · 344 citations)
20190.772Ranking-Based Deep Cross-Modal Hashing (AAAI 2019 · 70 citations)

NUS-WIDE, image→text, 16 bits · MAP (higher is better)

4 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 0.635
20172020
YearBest so farSet by
20170.635Pairwise Relationship Guided Deep Hashing for Cross-Modal Retrieval (AAAI 2017 · 344 citations)

NUS-WIDE, text→image, 16 bits · MAP (higher is better)

4 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 0.681
20172020
YearBest so farSet by
20170.681Pairwise Relationship Guided Deep Hashing for Cross-Modal Retrieval (AAAI 2017 · 344 citations)

What has been tried

27 papers here report 242 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 84%, no clear effect 2%, hurt 11%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add the multimodal knowledge graph and graph attention modelMSCOCO I→T, 128 bits · MAP0.823 -> 0.866HelpedSelf-Supervised Multi-Modal Knowledge Graph Contrastive Hashing for Cross-Modal Search (AAAI 2024 · 23 citations)
Add community detection to the fused similarity matrixMIRFLICKR-25K, I → T, 32 bits · mAP0.752 -> 0.754No clear effectVision-guided Text Mining for Unsupervised Cross-modal Hashing with Community Similarity Quantization (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)
Add the GAT classifierMIRFlickr25K I→T 64bit · mAP0.8464 -> 0.8637HelpedAn End-To-End Graph Attention Network Hashing for Cross-Modal Retrieval (NeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations)
Add TAAP, AGSF, and PACL to the CLIP-feature-and-hash baselineMIRFLICKR-25K, NUS-WIDE, and MS COCO I2T, 32bit · mAP0.8590 -> 0.9960; 0.7377 -> 0.9759; 0.7594 -> 0.8782HelpedPromptHash:Affinity-Prompted Collaborative Cross-Modal Learning for Adaptive Hashing Retrieval (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
add evidence correction loss LklMIRFLICKR25K and IAPR TC-12, image-to-text and text-to-image · mAP@ALL0.823 -> 0.853; 0.798 -> 0.831; 0.513 -> 0.590; 0.522 -> 0.600HelpedDeep Evidential Hashing for Trustworthy Cross-Modal Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
Add log-likelihood similarity preservationMIRFlickr-25K, IAPR TC-12, and NUS-WIDE; I→T and T→I, 128 bits · mAP0.7981 -> 0.8041; 0.6253 -> 0.6499; 0.7991 -> 0.8015; 0.8532 -> 0.8574; 0.6598 -> 0.6810; 0.8212 -> 0.8311HelpedLightweight Contrastive Distilled Hashing for Online Cross-modal Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
add the protein structure encoder to the language modelDNA 129 · F10.511 -> 0.574HelpedCrossBind: Collaborative Cross-Modal Identification of Protein Nucleic-Acid-Binding Residues (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
add autoencoder reconstruction lossNUS-WIDE, MIRFlickr and MSCOCO, I→T and T→I, 128 bits · mAP@500.856 -> 0.865; 0.832 -> 0.837; 0.936 -> 0.942; 0.914 -> 0.917; 0.909 -> 0.916; 0.924 -> 0.931HelpedStatistical Model-driven Similarity Hashing: Bridging Modalities for Efficient Unsupervised Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
Add RBF-kernelized modality featuresMIRFlickr I→T · mAP0.7605 -> 0.7278HurtAsymmetric Cross-Modal Hashing Based on Formal Concept Analysis (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
add KLM lossWikipedia, NUS-WIDE, XMedia, and XMediaNet · MAP21.6 -> 68.6; 12.2 -> 69.5; 13.4 -> 75.0; 0.9 -> 51.0HelpedSHE: Streaming-media Hashing Retrieval (ICML 2025)
Vary the number of similar concepts kImageNet training · training lossMixedOne for All: A Universal Generator for Concept Unlearnability via Multi-Modal Alignment (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 11 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • NUS-WIDE · 7 of 11 papers
  • MIRFLICKR-25K · 4 of 11 papers
  • MS-COCO · 4 of 11 papers
  • IAPR TC-12 · 3 of 11 papers
  • MIRFlickr · 2 of 11 papers

Baselines

  • DSPH · 3 of 11 papers
  • DJSRH · 3 of 11 papers
  • JDSH · 3 of 11 papers
  • DCMH · 3 of 11 papers
  • DNpH · 3 of 11 papers
  • DHaPH · 3 of 11 papers
  • DAEH · 3 of 11 papers
  • CIRH · 3 of 11 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 30 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy