AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Retrieval and matching with generative features

Apply generative or diffusion features to re-ranking, matching, and metric learning.

140 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Autoregressive and latent generation, keyword cluster “captioning · assessment · synthetic”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

42 papers in 2023–24 and 56 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.9% to 6.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 5182019: 11192020: 8202021: 4212022: 8222023: 17232024: 25242025: 31252026: 2526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

111 papers here report 1,114 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 21%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use 3 KAN layers instead of 1Segmentation ablation · IoU64.20 -> 65.26HelpedU-KAN Makes Strong Backbone for Medical Image Segmentation and Generation (AAAI 2025 · 308 citations)
remove position guidanceGSO-Hard · pose accuracy @5°11.0 -> 10.0HurtOmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidance (CVPR 2024 · 86 citations)
train LoFTR from scratch on synthetic RGB-IRSynthetic RGB-IR · AUC@10°12.58 -> 23.63HelpedMINIMA: Modality Invariant Image Matching (CVPR 2025 · 44 citations)
add freezing of the last CLIP layer after pretrainingGeoGuessr holdout, 5,000 Street View locations · median error (km)45.47 -> 44.35HelpedPIGEON: Predicting Image Geolocations (CVPR 2024 · 26 citations)
Add semantic-shift decomposition to the baselineCIRR validation · Recall@142.62 -> 45.13HelpedDecomposing Semantic Shifts for Composed Image Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 23 citations)
Use APSC-Net with MIML training data rather than without MIMLCASIAv1 · IoU.799 -> .810HelpedTowards Modern Image Manipulation Localization: A Large-Scale Dataset and Novel Methods (CVPR 2024 · 18 citations)
Add ImageNet pretrainingTexTile test set · Error0.459 -> 0.064HelpedTexTile: A Differentiable Metric for Texture Tileability (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
replace abundance-space generation with original HSI-cube-space generationChikusei HSI · generation qualityHurtUnmixing Before Fusion: A Generalized Paradigm for Multi-Source-based Hyperspectral Image Synthesis (CVPR 2024 · 15 citations)
Vary the number of nearest neighbors KSix VPR datasets · AUC-PRHelpedOn the Estimation of Image-matching Uncertainty in Visual Place Recognition (CVPR 2024 · 13 citations)
add LIPN instance pre-screening to DMINCamelyon16 test · inference time23.46 -> 16.75HelpedFast and Accurate Gigapixel Pathological Image Classification with Hierarchical Distillation Multi-Instance Learning (CVPR 2025 · 11 citations)
Add Adaptive Sampling to the Prompt PredictorSA-1B · mIoU57.2 -> 72.8HelpedAoP-SAM: Automation of Prompts for Efficient Segmentation (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
Add DPE instead of ordinary patch embeddingHBC, HER2+, and cSCC · PCC (%)47.13 -> 48.07; 43.10 -> 44.17; 49.35 -> 50.50HelpedM2OST: Many-to-one Regression for Predicting Spatial Transcriptomics from Digital Pathology Images (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 38 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • BUSI · 2 of 38 papers
  • GlaS · 2 of 38 papers
  • HCP · 2 of 38 papers
  • FashionIQ · 2 of 38 papers
  • CIRR · 2 of 38 papers
  • CUB-200 · 2 of 38 papers
  • HEST-1k · 2 of 38 papers
  • HER2ST · 2 of 38 papers

Baselines

  • UNet · 3 of 38 papers
  • ST-Net · 3 of 38 papers
  • HisToGene · 3 of 38 papers
  • BLEEP · 3 of 38 papers
  • Att-UNet · 3 of 38 papers
  • Mathpix · 2 of 38 papers
  • ResNet50 · 2 of 38 papers
  • ViT-B/16 · 2 of 38 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 98 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy