atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Towards Modern Image Manipulation Localization: A Large-Scale Dataset and Novel Methods

CVPR 2024 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Retrieval and matching with generative features · 18 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CAAA, a category-aware auto-annotation paradigm with a QES quality metric, uses it to build the 123,150-image MIML manipulation-localization dataset, and introduces the APSC-Net model.

Problem

Image manipulation localization is limited by the scarcity of high-quality, manually forged training data, since pixel-level annotation is costly and synthetic data generalizes poorly.

Approach

Split image pairs into Shared Probe Group (SPG) and Shared Donor Group (SDG) with a self-supervised classifier, handle each with a specialized constrained-localization model (difference-aware segmentation for SPG, semantic-aligned correlation matching for SDG), auto-annotate web-collected forged images, and filter labels with a confidence/sharpness score (QES).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use APSC-Net with MIML training data rather than without MIML (ablation)APSC-Net · CASIAv1IoU: .799 -> .810Helped
Use APSC-Net with MIML training data rather than without MIML (ablation)APSC-Net · NIST16IoU: .398 -> .525Helped
Use APSC-Net with MIML training data rather than without MIML (ablation)APSC-Net · CoverageIoU: .490 -> .498Helped
Use APSC-Net with MIML training data rather than without MIML (ablation)APSC-Net · ColumbiaIoU: .956 -> .962Helped
Add the difference map to the semantic segmentation model input (ablation)DASS on IMD20 SPG · IMD20 SPGIoU: .718 -> .834Helped
Add the image-pair input alongside the difference map (ablation)DASS on IMD20 SPG · IMD20 SPGIoU: .741 -> .834Helped
Add top-down fusion (ablation)SACM on IMD20 SDG · IMD20 SDGIoU: .590 -> .702Helped
Add cross-level matching (ablation)SACM on IMD20 SDG · IMD20 SDGIoU: .608 -> .702Helped
Filter predictions using QES > 0.5 (ablation)SACM on IMD20 SDG · IMD20 SDGIoU: .702 -> .903Helped
Increase the QES threshold from 0.0 to 0.5 (ablation)SACM predictions on IMD20 SDG · IMD20 SDGIoU: .702 -> .903Helped
Replace MIML with augmented IMDP1 for training (ablation)APSC-Net · CASIAv1IoU: .810 -> .790Hurt

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CASIAv2 IMD20 COCO MIML

Benchmarks: CASIAv1 NIST16 Coverage IMD20 Columbia

Metrics: IoU F1

Baselines: DMVN DMAC PSCC-Net CAT-Netv2 ManTraNet RRU-Net MVSS-Net IF-OSN EVP TruFor

Builds on: DMVN DMAC CAT-Net PSCC-Net ConvNeXt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy