AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Synthetic training data from generators

Use generated images for classification training and evaluate generative models.

111 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Autoregressive and latent generation, keyword cluster “captioning · assessment · synthetic”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

44 papers in 2023–24 and 35 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.3% to 3.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 1172018: 1182019: 7192020: 5202021: 7212022: 9222023: 19232024: 25242025: 22252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

91 papers here report 979 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 17%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add test-time normal sample conditioningAnomaly generation · generation qualityHelpedUnseen Visual Anomaly Generation (CVPR 2025 · 21 citations)
Remove both margin-based rank lossesNatural Questions · hits@568.8 -> 65.8No clear effectLearning to Rank in Generative Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
add the pre-trained font codebookUFUC · SSIM0.793 -> 0.810HelpedVQ-FONT: Few-Shot Font Generation with Structure-Aware Enhancement and Quantization (AAAI 2024 · 21 citations)
Add input perturbationCIFAR-100 · top-1 accuracy63.39 -> 64.38HelpedRobustness-Guided Image Synthesis for Data-Free Quantization (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
add diffusion-style noise during trainingCue-conflict images · shape bias21% -> 57%HelpedIntriguing Properties of Generative Classifiers (ICLR 2024 · 9 citations)
Set the noise-input l2 distance to 0.5 rather than 0.3Average across CASIA, PolyU, HFUT, and TongJi · TAR@1e-40.9057 -> 0.9239HelpedPVTree: Realistic and Controllable Palm Vein Generation for Recognition Tasks (AAAI 2025 · 8 citations)
Use AutoPresent with SlidesLib instead of AutoPresent without SlidesLibDetailed instructions with images · overall score45.2 -> 55.0HelpedAutoPresent: Designing Structured Visuals from Scratch (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
add the metrical controllerSonnet test · semantic average61.70 -> 63.60HelpedPoetryDiffusion: Towards Joint Semantic and Metrical Manipulation in Poetry Generation (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
use 3D C2A2 instead of 2D AV representationAffectNet · FED20.347 -> 16.060HelpedA Unified and Interpretable Emotion Representation and Expression Generation (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
Use QDGS pretraining with ArcFace rather than ArcFace baseline aloneRFW dark-skinned · accuracy79.7±0.3 -> 82.8±0.2HelpedQuality-Diversity Generative Sampling for Learning with Synthetic Data (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
Add Stable Diffusion generator artifacts to retrieved real images using SDEditFGVC-Aircraft · downstream accuracyHurtThe Unmet Promise of Synthetic Training Images: Using Retrieved Real Images Performs Better (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add Self-Debug LearningACPR test · Acc31.89 -> 31.95HelpedLess Is More: Adaptive Program Repair with Bug Localization and Preference Learning (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 24 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 5 of 24 papers
  • ImageNet · 4 of 24 papers
  • FFHQ · 3 of 24 papers
  • CelebA · 3 of 24 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 24 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 2 of 24 papers
  • Tiny-ImageNet · 2 of 24 papers
  • ImageNet-100 · 2 of 24 papers

Baselines

  • FID · 3 of 24 papers
  • GIF · 2 of 24 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 79 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy