atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

AoP-SAM: Automation of Prompts for Efficient Segmentation

AAAI 2025 · Image generation › Autoregressive and latent generation · approach: Retrieval and matching with generative features · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes AoP-SAM, a lightweight CNN Prompt Predictor that uses SAM's image embeddings to output a prompt confidence map, plus test-time adaptive sampling and filtering, to automatically generate point prompts for SAM without fine-tuning SAM.

Problem

Automatic prompt generation for SAM: grid-based automatic mask generation is either too sparse (missing objects) or too dense (redundant masks and latency), and detector-based prompts (OAS with YOLOv8) add heavy computational overhead.

Approach

A lightweight prompt predictor fuses the raw image and SAM's ViT image embedding to produce a prompt confidence map, and a coarse-to-fine test-time Adaptive Sampling and Filtering step removes prompts likely to yield duplicate masks, using previously generated masks as references.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use AoP-SAM instead of OAS (Central Point)MobileSAM with ViT_H image encoder · SA-1BmIoU: 68.3 -> 70.6Helped
Use AoP-SAM instead of AMG_DMobileSAM with ViT_H image encoder · COCOmIoU: 69.5 -> 70.1Helped
Use AoP-SAM instead of AMG_DMobileSAM with ViT_H image encoder · LVISmIoU: 71.0 -> 71.9Helped
Add Adaptive Sampling to the Prompt Predictor (ablation)AoP-SAM · SA-1BmIoU: 57.2 -> 72.8Helped
Add Adaptive Sampling to the Prompt Predictor (ablation)AoP-SAM · COCOmIoU: 67.9 -> 70.5Helped
Add Adaptive Sampling to the Prompt Predictor (ablation)AoP-SAM · LVISmIoU: 60.9 -> 71.7Helped
Add Adaptive Filtering after Adaptive Sampling (ablation)AoP-SAM · SA-1BmIoU: 72.8 -> 71.3Hurt
Add Adaptive Filtering after Adaptive Sampling (ablation)AoP-SAM · COCOmIoU: 70.5 -> 70.1Hurt
Add Adaptive Filtering after Adaptive Sampling (ablation)AoP-SAM · LVISmIoU: 71.7 -> 71.9Helped
Increase the sampling smoothing factor from 1 to 4 (ablation)AoP-SAM · SA-1BmIoU: 72.4 -> 63.4Hurt
Increase the confidence intensity threshold from 0.1 to 0.4 (ablation)AoP-SAM · SA-1BmIoU: 70.9 -> 66.4Hurt
Increase the prompt spacing factor from 4 to 7 (ablation)AoP-SAM · SA-1BmIoU: 72.7 -> 68.9Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SA-1B

Benchmarks: SA-1B COCO LVIS

Metrics: mIoU inference latency peak memory number of prompts

Baselines: AMG_S AMG_D OAS (Box) OAS (Central Point)

Builds on: Segment Anything Model Automatic Mask Generation Object-Aware Sampling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy