AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation

Generalizable fake image detection

Detect AI-generated images with large-scale datasets, multi-generator training, and semantic-pixel features.

119 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Autoregressive and latent generation, keyword cluster “ai · watermarking · generated”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

28 papers in 2023–24 and 80 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 5.9% to 8.9%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 2192020: 3202021: 3212022: 3222023: 13232024: 15242025: 34252026: 4626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

67 papers here report 692 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 59%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 28%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add frequency-domain features to the forgery-aware adapterGANs dataset, 4-class ProGAN; mean · ACCM95.4 -> 98.4; over −3.0% ACC gapsHelpedForgery-aware Adaptive Transformer for Generalizable Synthetic Image Detection (CVPR 2024 · 112 citations)
add an attention module between detection and segmentation featuresSID-Set tampered localization · AUC84.1 -> 87.3HelpedSIDA: Social Media Image Deepfake Detection, Localization and Explanation with Large Multimodal Model (CVPR 2025 · 53 citations)
Train the diffusion model with timestep T=1 instead of the selected T=4tumor synthesis · segmentation performanceHurtTowards Generalizable Tumor Synthesis (CVPR 2024 · 36 citations)
Remove text input from LGDCornell (H) · success rate0.86 -> 0.85HurtLanguage-driven Grasp Detection (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
use self-conditioned image generation rather than text-driven pairing for training dataSynthbuster and WildRF (AVG) · balanced accuracy61.9 -> 81.4HelpedA Bias-Free Training Paradigm for More General AI-generated Image Detection (CVPR 2025 · 24 citations)
replace MFM ViT-B/16 with CLIP ViT-B/16 as the backbone5 real-image sources, 13 generative models · AUC91.0 -> 87.6HurtAny-Resolution AI-Generated Image Detection by Spectral Learning (CVPR 2025 · 23 citations)
Increase the training set sizeAI-Face test set · AUCHelpedAI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark (CVPR 2025 · 15 citations)
Use CLIP ViT-L/14 rather than the other tested backbonesStable Diffusion v1.4 training and generative-model tests · APHelpedTowards Universal AI-Generated Image Detection by Variational Information Bottleneck Network (CVPR 2025 · 14 citations)
Train on more latent diffusion models while fixing the total number of training imagesExtended evaluation set across generator types · mAPHelpedCommunity Forensics: Using Thousands of Generators to Train Fake Image Detectors (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
Use the patch-based classifier with zero padding instead of resizingOpen-world · Avg. Acc.82.12 -> 85.97HelpedBreaking Semantic Artifacts for Generalized AI-generated Image Detection (NeurIPS 2024 · 10 citations)
Add ODA17 GAN datasets, quality-aware, 2-class training · mean accuracy69.4 -> 71.0HelpedODDN: Addressing Unpaired Data Challenges in Open-World Deepfake Detection on Online Social Networks (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)
Use adaptive fusion instead of straightforward feature-integration methodsSynthetic image detection · detection performanceHelpedCO-SPY: Combining Semantic and Pixel Features to Detect Synthetic Images by AI (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 39 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • GenImage · 12 of 39 papers
  • ImageNet · 9 of 39 papers
  • COCO · 8 of 39 papers
  • ForenSynths · 5 of 39 papers
  • DRCT-2M · 5 of 39 papers
  • LSUN · 5 of 39 papers
  • LAION · 4 of 39 papers
  • FFHQ · 4 of 39 papers

Baselines

  • NPR · 16 of 39 papers
  • UnivFD · 13 of 39 papers
  • DIRE · 12 of 39 papers
  • LGrad · 12 of 39 papers
  • FatFormer · 9 of 39 papers
  • CNNSpot · 9 of 39 papers
  • DRCT · 9 of 39 papers
  • F3Net · 7 of 39 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 108 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 33 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy