AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

GNN explainability

Evaluate and generate explanations for GNN predictions.

64 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “gnn · explanations · trained”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

22 papers in 2023–24 and 28 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.6% to 5.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 4202021: 4212022: 5222023: 8232024: 14242025: 15252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

46 papers here report 463 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 20%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase k from 1 to 60BA-Community, Tree-Circles, Tree-Grid, BA-2motifs, MUTAG · AUC-ROCBA-Community: 0.850 -> 0.952; Tree-Circles: 0.758 -> 0.778; Tree-Grid: 0.711 -> 0.770; BA-2motifs: 0.580 -> 0.588; MUTAGHelpedFactorized Explainer for Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
reduce supervision to 5 labeled atoms per predicateHanoi · ROC-AUC99.99 -> 90.62HurtRelational Concept Bottleneck Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
use exact rather than sampling-based Shapley computationBAMultiShapes · fidelity0.86 ± 0.01 -> 0.87 ± 0.02HelpedGraphTrail: Translating GNN Predictions into Human-Interpretable Logical Rules (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
add contrastive loss LctsCiteseer · accuracy69.01±1.2 -> 71.26±0.7HelpedSelf-Interpretable Graph Learning with Sufficient and Necessary Explanations (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
remove mix-up processingall four datasets · AUC-ROCHurtRegExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networks in Regression Tasks (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
add attention-based motif identification instead of individual-motif scoringMutagenicity · Average Probability0.9892 -> 0.9959HelpedMAGE: Model-Level Graph Neural Networks Explanations via Motif-based Graph Generation (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
Add lifting of graphs to cell complexesSynth-Wheel/Cube · GEAHelpedHigher Order Structures for Graph Explanations (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Retrain the classifier with the frozen subgraph extractorSPMotif 0.5 · accuracy46.85 -> 60.09HelpedHow Interpretable Are Interpretable Graph Neural Networks? (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Add linear-complexity search to existing node- and edge-level explainersMUTAG, BA-2Motifs, and Mutagenicity · overall fidelityHelpedEiG-Search: Generating Edge-Induced Subgraphs for GNN Explanation in Linear Time (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use a larger perturbation budgetAttack performance across datasets · overlap ratioHelpedGraph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
remove the Rule channelRedBlueNodes test · accuracy\nentry{100}{00} -> \nentry{50}{02}HurtBeyond Topological Self-Explainable GNNs: A Formal Explainability Perspective (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
remove clusteringFCR / NCI1 · coverage42.9% -> 10.1%HurtCOMRECGC: Global Graph Counterfactual Explainer through Common Recourse (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 20 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Mutagenicity · 3 of 20 papers
  • AIDS · 3 of 20 papers
  • MUTAG · 2 of 20 papers
  • BBBP · 2 of 20 papers
  • Proteins · 2 of 20 papers

Baselines

  • GNNExplainer · 5 of 20 papers
  • SubgraphX · 3 of 20 papers
  • PG-Explainer · 2 of 20 papers
  • GSAT · 2 of 20 papers
  • GNNInterpreter · 2 of 20 papers
  • ProtGNN · 2 of 20 papers
  • XGNN · 2 of 20 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy