atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Gaussian splatting

Gaussian Splatting for Efficient Satellite Image Photogrammetry

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › Gaussian splatting · approach: Regularization and primitive design for 3DGS · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Adapts 3D Gaussian Splatting to multi-date satellite photogrammetry (EOGS), adding affine RPC approximation, shadow mapping, and sparsity, view-consistency and opacity regularizers to reach EO-NeRF-level DSM accuracy in minutes.

Problem

Digital surface modeling from multi-date, non-orthorectified satellite images is slow with NeRF-based Earth observation methods, which take many hours to train.

Approach

Adapt standard 3DGS to satellite imagery by approximating RPC camera models locally as affine cameras, rendering cast shadows via a shadow-mapping pipeline using sun cameras, and adding L1 opacity sparsity, local view-consistency and entropy-based opaqueness losses.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add shadow mapping (ablation)EOGS · JAX and IARPA sceneselevation MAE: 3.16 metersHelped
add view-consistency regularization (ablation)EOGS · JAX and IARPA sceneselevation MAE: 0.20 metersHelped
add opaqueness regularization (ablation)EOGS · JAX and IARPA sceneselevation MAE: 0.09 metersHelped
add sparsity regularization (ablation)EOGS · JAX and IARPA sceneselevation MAE: 0.04 metersHelped
add sparsity regularization (ablation)EOGS · JAX and IARPA scenestraining timeHelped
use both altitude and color consistency regularization (ablation)EOGS · JAX 260elevation MAEHelped
use the full EOGS method instead of EO-NeRFsatellite photogrammetry datasets · JAX and IARPA, no maskelevation MAEMixed
use EOGS instead of EO-NeRFsatellite photogrammetry datasets · JAX and IARPA, foliage maskelevation MAENo clear effect
use EOGS instead of EO-NeRF in regions with high image coveragesatellite photogrammetry datasets · regions visible in most imageselevation MAEHelped
use EOGS instead of EO-NeRF in regions with low image coveragesatellite photogrammetry datasets · regions observed in only a few imageselevation MAEHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DFC2019 IARPA 2016 Multi-View Stereo 3D Mapping Challenge

Benchmarks: DFC2019 IARPA2016

Metrics: mean absolute error on elevation (m) training time (minutes)

Baselines: EO-NeRF SAT-NGP Sat-Mesh S2P

Builds on: 3D Gaussian Splatting EO-NeRF Sat-NeRF 3DGS-MCMC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy