atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Unifying Multi-Modal Uncertainty Modeling and Semantic Alignment for Text-to-Image Person Re-identification

AAAI 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Probabilistic embeddings for cross-modal retrieval · 39 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Models image and text embeddings as Gaussian distributions with multi-granularity (batch- and identity-level) uncertainty, adds a bi-directional cross-modal circle loss and a cross-modal global semantic recovery task on a CLIP-based TI-ReID model.

Problem

Text-to-image person re-identification relies on deterministic image/text embeddings that ignore the inherent uncertainty of pedestrian images and their textual descriptions, limiting cross-modal semantic alignment.

Approach

Represent global image and text features as Gaussian distributions whose variance combines batch-level and identity-level (memory-bank) feature variances, use the sampled features as augmentation, and align them with a cross-modal circle loss plus a masked global token reconstruction task (cm-GSR) on top of CLIP.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the full method instead of the CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselineTI-ReID model · CUHK-PEDESRank-1 accuracy: 72.98 -> 74.25Helped
Use the full method instead of the CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselineTI-ReID model · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 63.40Helped
Use the full method instead of the CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselineTI-ReID model · ICFG-PEDESRank-1 accuracy: 63.34 -> 65.62Helped
Add MUM (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 62.35Helped
Add cm-Circle loss (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 61.50Helped
Add cm-GSR (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 61.25Helped
Add cm-Circle to MUM (ablation)MUM variant · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 62.35 -> 62.45Helped
Add cm-GSR to MUM (ablation)MUM variant · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 62.35 -> 62.80Helped
Add cm-GSR to MUM + cm-Circle (ablation)MUM + cm-Circle variant · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 62.45 -> 63.40Helped
Use batch-level uncertainty modeling (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 61.20Helped
Use identity-level uncertainty modeling (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 61.65Helped
Combine batch-level and identity-level uncertainty as multi-granularity MUM (ablation)CLIP-ViT-B/16 baseline · RSTPReidRank-1 accuracy: 59.80 -> 62.35Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CUHK-PEDES RSTPReid ICFG-PEDES

Benchmarks: CUHK-PEDES RSTPReid ICFG-PEDES

Metrics: Rank-1 Rank-5 Rank-10 mAP

Baselines: IRRA CFine MCM IVT TIPCB TextReID AXM-Net LGUR

Builds on: CLIP IRRA circle loss similarity distribution matching loss probabilistic cross-modal embedding

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy