AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / CLIP and zero-shot

Adapting VLMs for zero-shot classification

Improves zero-shot classification by adding text descriptions, LLM prompts and long-tail handling to VLMs.

108 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2021–2026) · an approach in CLIP and zero-shot, keyword cluster “zero shot · open · vocabulary”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 3 tracked benchmarks.

47 papers in 2023–24 and 57 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 12.7% to 11.4%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 1212022: 3222023: 15232024: 32242025: 28252026: 2926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ImageNet · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 752024: 772025: 79.26
20232025

ImageNetV2 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2023: 69.32024: 71.05
20232025

Places365 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2023–2025 · still improving

2023: 40.552024: 44.092025: 45.59
20232025

What has been tried

77 papers here report 961 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 75%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 18%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add the lightweight feature-matching decoderMVTec-AD (unsupervised) · Pixel-AUCfrom ~72.2 accuracy-only baseline to 90.9 pixel-AUC with decoderHelpedAnomalyGPT: Detecting Industrial Anomalies Using Large Vision-Language Models (AAAI 2024 · 279 citations)
fine-tune the LLM during visual-language pre-training instead of freezing itVLM ablation average (4 tasks), 4-shot · average accuracy/score44.5 -> 70.9HelpedVILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Models (CVPR 2024 · 224 citations)
adapt CLIP with multi-level feature adapters rather than independently optimized multi-level projectorsMedical zero-shot benchmarks · AC AUC+13.57% average improvementHelpedAdapting Visual-Language Models for Generalizable Anomaly Detection in Medical Images (CVPR 2024 · 113 citations)
Increase the retained SkyScript fraction from 20% to 50%Seven scene-classification benchmarks · average top-1 accuracy (%)59.81 -> 59.93HelpedSkyScript: A Large and Semantically Diverse Vision-Language Dataset for Remote Sensing (AAAI 2024 · 91 citations)
Add L2 normalization and adaptive temperature to the qkv self-self attention ensemblePascalVOC · mIoU43.1 -> 45.1HelpedGrounding Everything: Emerging Localization Properties in Vision-Language Transformers (CVPR 2024 · 50 citations)
Use dynamic and static memory networks togethertraining-free few-shot classification · accuracyHelpedDual Memory Networks: A Versatile Adaptation Approach for Vision-Language Models (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
Add habitat descriptions to visual attributesCUB, zero-shot test classes · accuracy53.34 -> 54.01HelpedImproved Zero-Shot Classification by Adapting VLMs with Text Descriptions (CVPR 2024 · 33 citations)
Use visual programming instead of dialog with LLMScanRefer validation · Acc@0.525.4 -> 32.1HelpedVisual Programming for Zero-shot Open-Vocabulary 3D Visual Grounding (CVPR 2024 · 32 citations)
use synonyms as well as original concept names for retrieval, rather than original names alonestandard zero-shot recognition datasets · mean per-class accuracy+4%HelpedThe Neglected Tails in Vision-Language Models (CVPR 2024 · 27 citations)
add scene layout to 3D positionsNr3D validation, Overall · accuracy37.7 -> 39.7HelpedSeeGround: See and Ground for Zero-Shot Open-Vocabulary 3D Visual Grounding (CVPR 2025 · 26 citations)
Use a cleaned D200 dictionary instead of uncleaned D500CRC100K · weighted F10.804 -> 0.844HelpedCPLIP: Zero-Shot Learning for Histopathology with Comprehensive Vision-Language Alignment (CVPR 2024 · 26 citations)
Add Sky-SA dataset for fine-tuningiSAID · mIoU18.40 -> 27.76HelpedSkySense-O: Towards Open-World Remote Sensing Interpretation with Vision-Centric Visual-Language Modeling (CVPR 2025 · 25 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 30 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 6 of 30 papers
  • DTD · 5 of 30 papers
  • ImageNetV2 · 4 of 30 papers
  • EuroSAT · 4 of 30 papers
  • Oxford Pets · 4 of 30 papers
  • Stanford Cars · 4 of 30 papers
  • Food101 · 4 of 30 papers
  • Flowers102 · 3 of 30 papers

Baselines

  • CLIP · 5 of 30 papers
  • CoOp · 3 of 30 papers
  • VideoChatGPT · 3 of 30 papers
  • TDA · 3 of 30 papers
  • CLIP-Adapter · 2 of 30 papers
  • YOLOv8 · 2 of 30 papers
  • ZLaP · 2 of 30 papers
  • DMN · 2 of 30 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 104 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 31 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy