AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / CLIP and zero-shot

Feature calibration for unseen-class detection

Calibrates multimodal features to handle few-shot, unseen-class and out-of-distribution inputs.

50 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2022–2026) · an approach in CLIP and zero-shot, keyword cluster “prompt · tuning · pre trained”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 5.7% to 5.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 2222023: 9232024: 12242025: 15252026: 1226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

36 papers here report 435 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 75%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 17%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add DaTP to the baselineCUB-200-2011 · accuracy90.8 -> 91.3HelpedDelving into Multimodal Prompting for Fine-Grained Visual Classification (AAAI 2024 · 70 citations)
add the prototype-guided patch decoder instead of ABMIL aggregationTIHD-RCC (16-shot), low-scale prompt · AUC76.8 ± 3.1 -> 79.4 ± 2.1HelpedViLa-MIL: Dual-scale Vision-Language Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 52 citations)
add attentive fusion with retrieved names from external visual-name memoryCOCO test · CIDEr134.4 -> 140.1HelpedEVCap: Retrieval-Augmented Image Captioning with External Visual-Name Memory for Open-World Comprehension (CVPR 2024 · 44 citations)
add PCO and feature rank lossCross-domain average · angular error (degrees)7.71 -> 6.97HelpedCLIP-Gaze: Towards General Gaze Estimation via Visual-Linguistic Model (AAAI 2024 · 24 citations)
use asymmetric face-conditioned prompts {T0,T3} instead of fixed prompts {T0,T1}Celeb-DF-v2, trained on FF++/DF · AUC (%)82.88 -> 88.41HelpedStanding on the Shoulders of Giants: Reprogramming Visual-Language Model for General Deepfake Detection (AAAI 2025 · 22 citations)
Add Sparse Mixture-of-Adapters instead of a single MLP-AdapterCUHK-PEDES · R@171.00 -> 72.00HelpedDM-Adapter: Domain-Aware Mixture-of-Adapters for Text-Based Person Retrieval (AAAI 2025 · 19 citations)
add image-specific distribution (ISD) in prompt flowMVTec-AD · image-level AUROC92.3 vs 89.1 without ISDHelpedBayesian Prompt Flow Learning for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection (CVPR 2025 · 19 citations)
Replace GoPT with shallow VPT-style promptsNYUDv2 · mIoU54.1 -> 50.2HurtPrompting Multi-Modal Image Segmentation with Semantic Grouping (AAAI 2024 · 17 citations)
add kernel-aware hierarchical graph (KAHG)VisA 1-shot · AUROC89.7 -> 91.3HelpedKernel-Aware Graph Prompt Learning for Few-Shot Anomaly Detection (AAAI 2025 · 16 citations)
replace Gaussian-noise pseudo-spoof features with prompt learning for live and spoof featuresOCM→I · HTER (%)34.43 -> 26.64HelpedSLIP: Spoof-Aware One-Class Face Anti-Spoofing with Language Image Pretraining (AAAI 2025 · 12 citations)
Add LAlignCIFAR10, CIFAR+10, CIFAR+50, TinyImageNet · AUC66.7 -> 76.0; 81.3 -> 87.1; 79.8 -> 85.5; 58.1 -> 67.2HelpedImproving Open Set Recognition via Visual Prompts Distilled from Common-Sense Knowledge (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
add symmetry-related loss LSMegaAge-Asian · CA(3)67.74 -> 69.60HelpedLearning Triangular Distribution in Visual World (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 16 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 3 of 16 papers
  • MVTecAD · 2 of 16 papers
  • VisA · 2 of 16 papers
  • ImageNet · 2 of 16 papers
  • Food-101 · 2 of 16 papers
  • Oxford-Pets · 2 of 16 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 16 papers
  • CUB200-2011 · 2 of 16 papers

Baselines

  • WinCLIP · 2 of 16 papers
  • APRIL-GAN · 2 of 16 papers
  • LaBo · 2 of 16 papers
  • Grad-CAM · 2 of 16 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 48 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 26 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy