AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / CLIP and zero-shot

Self-distillation for vision-language pretraining

Pretrains vision-language models with bootstrapping, masked and self-distillation objectives.

48 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2022–2026) · an approach in CLIP and zero-shot, keyword cluster “contrastive · language image · image text”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 20 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.7% to 4.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 7222023: 5232024: 16242025: 15252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

43 papers here report 495 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 73%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 15%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Inject visual noise into visual features using Cross Attention rather than image-level MLPImageNet, 16-shot · accuracy67.43 -> 70.93HelpedEnhance Vision-Language Alignment with Noise (AAAI 2025 · 42 citations)
Combine Align and Distill stages instead of aligning firstOH, TI, VLCS, and PACS average · OOD accuracy79.50 -> 73.24HurtLeveraging Vision-Language Models for Improving Domain Generalization in Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 29 citations)
Add augmentationDataComp large · Average0.536 -> 0.542HelpedData Filtering Networks (ICLR 2024 · 15 citations)
Use concept filtering rather than full-dataset continual pretrainingGeneral bioimaging classification (35 tasks) · average accuracy41.35 -> 47.72HelpedBIOMEDICA: An Open Biomedical Image-Caption Archive, Dataset, and Vision-Language Models Derived from Scientific Literature (CVPR 2025 · 14 citations)
Use curated 14M BLIP pretraining data instead of BLIP-129MAverage over 38 datasets · average score33.05 -> 34.03HelpedSieve: Multimodal Dataset Pruning using Image Captioning Models (CVPR 2024 · 14 citations)
Add ECM to identify and use false negatives as positivesCOCO image-text retrieval, TR R@1 · R@176.6 -> 77.4HelpedMAFA: Managing False Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-training (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
Add image augmentationImageNet · top-1 accuracy17.5 -> 19.1HelpedCOSMOS: Cross-Modality Self-Distillation for Vision Language Pre-training (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
Add LCVTA without LMRTVACAM16 · weighted F10.567 -> 0.614HelpedMulti-Resolution Pathology-Language Pre-training Model with Text-Guided Visual Representation (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
Fix incorrect negatives using similarity-based positive-pair miningImageNet · Top-1 accuracy18.6 -> 21.3; 23.3 -> 26.8; 31.1 -> 32.9HelpedFFF: Fixing Flawed Foundations in Contrastive Pre-Training Results in Very Strong Vision-Language Models (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)
add masked distillation and teacher word-embedding projectionImageNet-ZeroShot · accuracy31.5 -> 33.9HelpedBuilding Vision-Language Models on Solid Foundations with Masked Distillation (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
Use identical-distribution initialization for new token embeddingsMSCOCO₃₆, image-to-text · average Recall@129.6 -> 32.4HelpedEmbracing Language Inclusivity and Diversity in CLIP through Continual Language Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Add the counterfactual debiasing lossFairFace gender debiasing · ABLE75.58 -> 78.35HelpedJoint Vision-Language Social Bias Removal for CLIP (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 15 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 4 of 15 papers
  • CC3M · 4 of 15 papers
  • CC12M · 4 of 15 papers
  • YFCC15M · 3 of 15 papers
  • ImageNet-1k · 3 of 15 papers
  • Flickr30k · 3 of 15 papers
  • MSCOCO · 3 of 15 papers
  • Caltech101 · 2 of 15 papers

Baselines

  • CLIP · 5 of 15 papers
  • DreamLIP · 3 of 15 papers
  • OpenCLIP · 3 of 15 papers
  • SigLIP · 3 of 15 papers
  • MaskCLIP · 2 of 15 papers
  • SCLIP · 2 of 15 papers
  • CoCa · 2 of 15 papers
  • PMC-CLIP · 2 of 15 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 41 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 28 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy