AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / CLIP and zero-shot

Parameter-efficient visual tuning

Adapts pretrained vision and multimodal models through visual prompt tuning or efficient fine-tuning.

41 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2022–2026) · an approach in CLIP and zero-shot, keyword cluster “prompt · tuning · pre trained”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 22 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 4.9% to 4.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 1222023: 6232024: 12242025: 12252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

28 papers here report 339 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 23%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add global and local video attention with shared parametersMSR-VTT-9K, Text→Video · R@143.5 -> 45.8HelpedDGL: Dynamic Global-Local Prompt Tuning for Text-Video Retrieval (AAAI 2024 · 34 citations)
add query-residual adaptation to the standard AdapterDiDeMo test, text-to-video retrieval · R@147.4 -> 48.7HelpedUniAdapter: Unified Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for Cross-modal Modeling (ICLR 2024 · 20 citations)
add Dense AlignerRefCOCO · Avg IoU74.6 -> 75.0HelpedDensely Connected Parameter-Efficient Tuning for Referring Image Segmentation (AAAI 2025 · 19 citations)
Add disentanglement lossCelebA Attractive · Equalized Odds15.0 -> 12.0HelpedFair-VPT: Fair Visual Prompt Tuning for Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 15 citations)
replace FFT with a fixed linear transformVTAB-1k Natural and Specialized · accuracy81.35% -> 80.98%; 84.93% -> 84.02%HurtVisual Fourier Prompt Tuning (NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations)
Add dynamic positive centroid sampling (DPS) instead of RPSWaterbirds · WGA73.08 -> 76.93HelpedCalibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations (CVPR 2024 · 14 citations)
Add LSkip to full fine-tuningBase-to-new generalization, 11 datasets (Avg) · H79.27 -> 81.00HelpedSkip Tuning: Pre-trained Vision-Language Models are Effective and Efficient Adapters Themselves (CVPR 2025 · 8 citations)
add both metric learning losses LML(x, p) and LML(p, xcls)VTAB-1K Natural · accuracy+1.08 ppHelpedDA-VPT: Semantic-Guided Visual Prompt Tuning for Vision Transformers (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
Add visual prompts and full-finetune the backboneVTAB-1k Natural · accuracy75.19 -> 72.80HurtFacing the Elephant in the Room: Visual Prompt Tuning or Full finetuning? (ICLR 2024 · 6 citations)
use multi-branch retrieval rather than cross-modal retrievalMicroLens · nMSE0.7441 -> 0.7338HelpedIn-context Prompt-augmented Micro-video Popularity Prediction (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Increase the C-TPT weight lambdaMultiple validation datasets · ECEHelpedC-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion (ICLR 2024 · 5 citations)
add gating balancing lossANLI-R1, ANLI-R2, ANLI-R3, QNLI, WNLI (average) · Average score77.57 -> 78.07HelpedMixture of LoRA Experts (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 13 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 5 of 13 papers
  • StanfordCars · 5 of 13 papers
  • Flowers102 · 4 of 13 papers
  • DTD · 4 of 13 papers
  • OxfordPets · 4 of 13 papers
  • UCF101 · 4 of 13 papers
  • Caltech101 · 4 of 13 papers
  • Food101 · 4 of 13 papers

Baselines

  • CoOp · 4 of 13 papers
  • CoCoOp · 4 of 13 papers
  • MaPLe · 4 of 13 papers
  • LoRA · 3 of 13 papers
  • PromptSRC · 3 of 13 papers
  • DePT · 3 of 13 papers
  • KgCoOp · 2 of 13 papers
  • TCP · 2 of 13 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 40 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 26 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy