AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Video / Action recognition

Skeleton-based action recognition

Recognizes actions from skeleton sequences with graph convolutions, LSTMs and prototypes.

46 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Action recognition, keyword cluster “action recognition · video recognition · representation”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

11 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 7.8% to 8.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: NTU RGB+D Cross-Subject (accuracy, last in 2019); NTU RGB+D Cross-View (accuracy, last in 2019).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 5162017: 5172018: 6182019: 2192020: 3202021: 1212022: 2222023: 8232024: 3242025: 2252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

NTU RGB+D Cross-Subject · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2016–2019 · not reported since 2019

2016: 62.932017: 79.572019: 89.2
20162019

NTU RGB+D Cross-View · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2016–2019 · not reported since 2019

2016: 70.272017: 84.832019: 95
20162019

What has been tried

37 papers here report 385 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 19%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add Motion Topology Enhancement (MTE)NTU RGB+D 120 X-Sub (bone modality) · accuracy87.8 -> 88.1HelpedRevealing Key Details to See Differences: A Novel Prototypical Perspective for Skeleton-based Action Recognition (CVPR 2025 · 36 citations)
Fuse JTG frame counts 2, 4, 6, and 8 rather than using N=1NTU-60 X-Sub · Top-1 accuracy (%)87.4 -> 91.7HelpedSpatio-Temporal Fusion for Human Action Recognition via Joint Trajectory Graph (AAAI 2024 · 19 citations)
add pretrainingTactile action classification test set · ACC@10.8050 -> 0.9033HelpedJointly Modeling Spatio-Temporal Features of Tactile Signals for Action Classification (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
add skeleton constraint FDiving48 · Acc@168.17 -> 72.99HelpedH-MoRe: Learning Human-centric Motion Representation for Action Analysis (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
apply linear transforms onlyCross-dataset average (four settings) · balanced accuracy54.4 -> 57.2HelpedRecovering Complete Actions for Cross-dataset Skeleton Action Recognition (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • NTU RGB+D · 2 of 5 papers
  • NTU RGB+D 120 · 2 of 5 papers

Baselines

  • ST-GCN · 2 of 5 papers
  • 2s-AGCN · 2 of 5 papers
  • MS-G3D · 2 of 5 papers
  • CTR-GCN · 2 of 5 papers
  • InfoGCN · 2 of 5 papers
  • SkeletonMAE · 2 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 22 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 34 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy