atlas

Research map / Video / Action recognition

Spatio-Temporal Fusion for Human Action Recognition via Joint Trajectory Graph

AAAI 2024 · Video › Action recognition · approach: Skeleton-based action recognition · 19 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes JT-GraphFormer, which builds a joint trajectory graph over multi-frame skeleton groups, applies Dijkstra-distance-weighted attention (STDA), and classifies with a Koopman operator for skeleton-based action recognition.

Problem

Skeleton-based human action recognition struggles to capture joint spatio-temporal dependencies: GCNs use only spatial topology and Transformer self-attention lacks topological structure information.

Approach

A Joint Trajectory Graph connects joints across neighboring frames into one uniform graph; a Spatio-Temporal Dijkstra Attention multiplies attention scores by exp(-shortest-path distance) plus a learnable bias; and a Koopman operator fitted via DMD serves as the classifier.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Fuse JTG frame counts 2, 4, 6, and 8 rather than using N=1 (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 87.4 -> 91.7Helped
Use JTG frame count N=6 rather than N=1 (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 87.4 -> 90.4Helped
Use a dynamic, shared JTG without normalization (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 89.8 -> 90.4Helped
Use a dynamic, normalized, shared JTG (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 89.8 -> 89.8No clear effect
Replace the fully connected classifier with a temporal Koopman operator (ablation)JT-GraphFormer with joint modality · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 90.4 -> 90.5Helped
Use a spatial Koopman operator for motion modalities (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-Sub, joint motion and bone motionTop-1 accuracy (%): 87.9 -> 88.4; 86.9 -> 87.3Helped
Ensemble joint and bone modalities rather than using joint only (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 91.8 -> 92.5Helped
Ensemble four streams rather than using joint only (ablation)JT-GraphFormer · NTU-60 X-SubTop-1 accuracy (%): 91.8 -> 93.4Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NTU RGB+D NTU RGB+D 120 N-UCLA

Benchmarks: NTU RGB+D NTU RGB+D 120 N-UCLA

Metrics: Top-1 accuracy

Baselines: ST-GCN 2s-AGCN DGNN Dynamic-GCN SGN DDGCN DC-GCN+ADG MS-G3D MST-GCN CTR-GCN InfoGCN STF

Builds on: Graphormer ST-GCN CTR-GCN 2s-AGCN dynamic mode decomposition

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy