AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Video / Action recognition

Fully supervised temporal action detection

Detects action boundaries using temporal convolution, multi-task recycling and context aggregation.

87 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Action recognition, keyword cluster “temporal action · action localization · action detection”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

15 papers in 2023–24 and 17 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 10.6% to 12.9%.

No longer reported by papers here: GTEA (accuracy, last in 2021); THUMOS14 (average mAP, last in 2024); Breakfast (Acc, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 5172018: 6182019: 8192020: 11202021: 9212022: 12222023: 8232024: 7242025: 4252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

GTEA · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2017–2021 · not reported since 2021

2017: 642018: 70.12019: 79.2
20172021

THUMOS14 · average mAP (higher is better)

5 papers, 2022–2024 · not reported since 2024

2022: 54.22023: 69.32024: 76.9
20222024

Breakfast · Acc (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 66.32021: 70.72022: 75.8
20192022

THUMOS’14 · mAP (higher is better)

4 papers, 2022–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2022: 72.52025: 73.2
20222025

What has been tried

73 papers here report 834 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 75%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 17%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase input from 768 to 3072 framesTHUMOS14 · average mAP68.8 -> 70.6HelpedEnd-to-End Temporal Action Detection with 1B Parameters Across 1000 Frames (CVPR 2024 · 53 citations)
Use time-aligned coordinate expression instead of normalized coordinatesTHUMOS14 · mAP@AVG40.2 -> 59.5HelpedTE-TAD: Towards Full End-to-End Temporal Action Detection via Time-Aligned Coordinate Expression (CVPR 2024 · 22 citations)
add 4 global inner-backbone propagation blocksTHUMOS14 validation · average mAP59.4 -> 62.3HelpedAdapting Short-Term Transformers for Action Detection in Untrimmed Videos (CVPR 2024 · 20 citations)
Add FrameDrop onlyTHUMOS14-C · corrupted mAP51.71 -> 52.56HelpedBenchmarking the Robustness of Temporal Action Detection Models Against Temporal Corruptions (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
add near-future generation and memory refinementTHUMOS’14 · mAP71.5 -> 73.0HelpedContext-Enhanced Memory-Refined Transformer for Online Action Detection (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
Add GRU50Salads · Edit19.6 to 27.1HelpedOnlineTAS: An Online Baseline for Temporal Action Segmentation (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
add prediction-feedback objectives (SA encoder, SA decoder, CA decoder) to DETRActivityNet-v1.3 · Avg. mAP (0.5-0.95)34.14 -> 38.62HelpedPrediction-Feedback DETR for Temporal Action Detection (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
increase AAPL sampling interval from 10 to 30 secondsActivityNet 1.3 · Avg mAP25.7 -> 24.7HurtAction-Agnostic Point-Level Supervision for Temporal Action Detection (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
Jointly train segmentation and anticipation, including segmentation loss on observed frames50 Salads LTA (alpha=0.2, beta=0.1) · MoC27.32 -> 39.55HelpedActFusion: a Unified Diffusion Model for Action Segmentation and Anticipation (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Add current frame-text contrastive lossTHUMOS’14 · mAP32.9 -> 36.3HelpedDoes Video-Text Pretraining Help Open-Vocabulary Online Action Detection? (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 6 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • THUMOS'14 · 4 of 6 papers
  • FineAction · 2 of 6 papers
  • ActivityNet-v1.3 · 2 of 6 papers

Baselines

  • ActionFormer · 2 of 6 papers
  • TriDet · 2 of 6 papers
  • DyFaDet · 2 of 6 papers
  • TadTR · 2 of 6 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 32 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy