AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

State-space and latent dynamics forecasting

Forecast via deep state-space, latent-state and dynamics-based models with approximation theory.

94 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Causal and generative time series, keyword cluster “conformal · causal discovery · predictions”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 28 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 11.6% to 12.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 6172018: 8182019: 9192020: 5202021: 10212022: 7222023: 12232024: 6242025: 15252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

74 papers here report 673 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use C-TimesBlock instead of RNNDJI stocks, context alignment · L_d0.626 -> 0.023HelpedMarket-GAN: Adding Control to Financial Market Data Generation with Semantic Context (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
add coverage loss (with efficiency loss)five datasets, one-step predictions · CS0.154 -> 0.104 (flu); 0.0883 -> 0.0551 (covid-19); 0.0466 -> 0.0221 (weather); 0.115 -> 0.0289 (smd); 0.0472 -> 0.0161 (HelpedNeural Conformal Control for Time Series Forecasting (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Use a well-specified velocity-field kernel to estimate the synthetic deformation parametersSynthetic time-series graph deformation · average relative error0.10, 0.03, 0.17HelpedShape analysis for time series (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Replace the linear base predictor with an MLPECL · MSE0.1646 ± 0.0001 -> 0.1616 ± 0.0005HelpedLETS Forecast: Learning Embedology for Time Series Forecasting (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use λ=1 rather than λ>1 subsequences per sequenceprivacy accounting after 100 training steps · δ(ε)HelpedPrivacy Amplification by Structured Subsampling for Deep Differentially Private Time Series Forecasting (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace independent random point masking with segment-based maskingAverage and zero substitution · CPD0.175 -> 0.177; 0.350 -> 0.366HelpedTIMING: Temporality-Aware Integrated Gradients for Time Series Explanation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove all normalization layerstriangle wave and pulse patterns, H=96 · performanceHelpedSynTSBench: Rethinking Temporal Pattern Learning in Deep Learning Models for Time Series (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add learned guidance to the transformation rather than mapping every sample to a single fixed manifoldIEEE SPC22 · RMSE19.18 -> 16.25HelpedShifting the Paradigm: A Diffeomorphism Between Time Series Data Manifolds for Achieving Shift-Invariancy in Deep Learning (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace ordinary convolutions with strided convolutions in predictive inferenceDNS speech separation, prediction length 3 · SI-SNRi (dB)4.61 -> 5.47HelpedSOI: Scaling Down Computational Complexity by Estimating Partial States of the Model (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Add adapt-STE rather than using STEECG · AUPRC0.6152±0.0007 -> 0.7183±0.0019HelpedOptimal Information Retention for Time-Series Explanations (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 20 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Electricity · 2 of 20 papers
  • Traffic · 2 of 20 papers
  • PAM · 2 of 20 papers
  • Boiler · 2 of 20 papers
  • Epilepsy · 2 of 20 papers

Baselines

  • iTransformer · 3 of 20 papers
  • PatchTST · 3 of 20 papers
  • DLinear · 3 of 20 papers
  • TimeMixer · 2 of 20 papers
  • Naive · 2 of 20 papers
  • WinIT · 2 of 20 papers
  • Dynamask · 2 of 20 papers
  • TimeX · 2 of 20 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 46 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy