AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

Probabilistic and conformal forecasting

Produce calibrated probabilistic or conformal forecasts for series, including hierarchical and non-stationary data.

121 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Causal and generative time series, keyword cluster “conformal · causal discovery · predictions”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 47 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 18.7% to 20.5%.

No longer reported by papers here: traffic (CRPS-Sum, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 7162017: 3172018: 4182019: 3192020: 6202021: 13212022: 9222023: 15232024: 14242025: 13252026: 3426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

traffic · CRPS-Sum (lower is better)

4 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 0.0782021: 0.0692024: 0.0649
20192024

What has been tried

81 papers here report 728 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 19%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase |D_cal,1| from 100 to 400F16 altitude validation · prediction-region widthHelpedConformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity Programming (AAAI 2024 · 20 citations)
Add the GAN component to DT-VAECounty-DH INC · DTP score0.8115±0.00055 -> 0.3717±0.00017HelpedCumulative Difference Learning VAE for Time-Series with Temporally Correlated Inflow-Outflow (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Use CopulaCPTS instead of CopulaParticle Sim (σ=.01), 90% · coverage86.9 -> 91.3HelpedCopula Conformal prediction for multi-step time series prediction (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
add retrieval instead of no retrievalSynthetic AR patterns, occurrences 1 · MSE0.2590 -> 0.2209HelpedRetrieval Augmented Time Series Forecasting (ICML 2025 · 2 citations)
Inject state prediction errors up to 50% instead of using ground-truth statesBouncing Ball obs. · coverage90.31 \plusminus 1.27 -> 90.13 \plusminus 1.40No clear effectConformal Prediction for Time-series Forecasting with Change Points (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Add local covariance ellipsoids to the global-covariance methodMultivariate time-series prediction · average prediction-set sizeup to 25% reductionHelpedConformal prediction for multi-dimensional time series by ellipsoidal sets (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
Add a low-pass filter to FITSTime series forecasting · performanceHurtAn Analysis of Linear Time Series Forecasting Models (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
add adaptive weight adjustment to semantic-space scores (CT-MS -> CT-SSF)Synthetic data, miscoverage risks 0.05–0.3 · WidthnullHelpedConformalized Time Series with Semantic Features (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase the maximal number of maintained experts, K_maxCovertype · classification performanceHelpedMixture of Online and Offline Experts for Non-Stationary Time Series (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
add graph message passing and node embeddingsGPVAR-RNN · Winkler2.04{ ±0.00} -> 1.67{ ±0.00}HelpedRelational Conformal Prediction for Correlated Time Series (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
use approximate FE instead of FBESynthetic MTS · time (s)375±772 -> 118±178HelpedChronoEpilogi: Scalable Time Series Selection with Multiple Solutions (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use Relaxed-WTA instead of annealed WTASolar · Distortion305.5 -> 280.03HelpedWinner-takes-all for Multivariate Probabilistic Time Series Forecasting (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 23 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Traffic · 7 of 23 papers
  • Weather · 7 of 23 papers
  • ETTh2 · 7 of 23 papers
  • ETTm1 · 7 of 23 papers
  • ETTh1 · 6 of 23 papers
  • ETTm2 · 6 of 23 papers
  • Solar · 5 of 23 papers
  • Electricity · 4 of 23 papers

Baselines

  • PatchTST · 4 of 23 papers
  • ACI · 4 of 23 papers
  • Autoformer · 3 of 23 papers
  • iTransformer · 3 of 23 papers
  • SPCI · 3 of 23 papers
  • HopCPT · 3 of 23 papers
  • OGD · 2 of 23 papers
  • TimeGrad · 2 of 23 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 76 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy