AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Time series / Causal and generative time series

Dynamical system reconstruction

Learn latent nonlinear or linear dynamical systems from time series data.

90 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Causal and generative time series, keyword cluster “conformal · causal discovery · predictions”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 14.8% to 11.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 2172018: 3182019: 5192020: 10202021: 10212022: 6222023: 7232024: 16242025: 10252026: 1726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

66 papers here report 570 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 20%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Combine lag-moment features F with inverse lag-moment features TUnder the sufficient condition in Theorem 2 · identifiability gapHelpedLearning the Causal Structure of Networked Dynamical Systems under Latent Nodes and Structured Noise (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Remove the DSR reconstruction lossMultimodal dynamical-system reconstruction · reconstruction performanceHurtIntegrating Multimodal Data for Joint Generative Modeling of Complex Dynamics (ICML 2024 · 5 citations)
Add GRU refinement to autoregressive forecastingFerry FC · RMSE0.0777 -> 0.0608HelpedSequential Modeling of Complex Marine Navigation: Case Study on a Passenger Vessel (Student Abstract) (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Add static covariates containing neuron spatial positions to TiDEZAPBench · MAEHurtZAPBench: A Benchmark for Whole-Brain Activity Prediction in Zebrafish (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
remove GTFLEMON · D_stsp2.73 ± 1.09 -> 3.77 ± 1.22HurtA scalable generative model for dynamical system reconstruction from neuroimaging data (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use the full emergence objective instead of predictive mutual information aloneBit-string dataset · emergent feature recoveryHelpedLearning diverse causally emergent representations from time series data (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
add the regularizerdysts, 5%, 25%, and 50% noise · Coefficient errorHelpedModeling Latent Non-Linear Dynamical System over Time Series (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Use squared instead of ReLU state-matrix parameterizationUEA-MTSCA Avg · accuracy67.8 -> 67.1HurtOscillatory State-Space Models (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
use hierarchical rather than ensemble shPLRNNsLorenz-63 · D_stsp1.82±0.16 -> 0.394±0.014HelpedLearning Interpretable Hierarchical Dynamical Systems Models from Time Series Data (ICLR 2025 · 1 citation)
Set the forecasting order to k=90 rather than k=45M4-Weekly · average sMAPE7.74 -> 6.28HelpedTowards Understanding Evolving Patterns in Sequential Data (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
use learnable frequency decomposition instead of a uniform frequency maskECL, Weather, and ETTh1 forecasting · MSEECL T=48: 0.137 vs 0.150; Weather T=48: 0.131 vs 0.134; ETTh1 T=48: 0.333 vs 0.329MixedSKOLR: Structured Koopman Operator Linear RNN for Time-Series Forecasting (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use a decomposed kernelCatechol single solvent · MSE0.011 -> 0.009HelpedThe Catechol Benchmark: Time-series Solvent Selection Data for Few-shot Machine Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 19 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • LRU · 4 of 19 papers
  • Mamba · 3 of 19 papers
  • Log-NCDE · 3 of 19 papers
  • NRDE · 2 of 19 papers
  • NCDE · 2 of 19 papers
  • S5 · 2 of 19 papers
  • ROCKET · 2 of 19 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy