AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Policy gradient and actor-critic

Stabilizing deep actor-critic

Study implementation choices, overestimation, and normalization to make deep actor-critic reliable.

48 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Policy gradient and actor-critic, keyword cluster “actor critic · policy actor · critic algorithms”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

15 papers in 2023–24 and 12 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.4% to 2.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 2182019: 2192020: 3202021: 7212022: 6222023: 5232024: 10242025: 8252026: 426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

38 papers here report 398 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 22%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
remove the exploration stageHopper, Ant, and Walker2d · episode returnHurtTwo-Stage Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning for Enhancing Exploration and Exploitation (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
Add the transformer-based encoderSim1 · F10.55±0.13 -> 0.63 ± 0.17HelpedMetaRLEC: Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Discovery of Brain Effective Connectivity (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
Optimize field widthsSingle fixed target · cumulative discounted reward (G)HelpedA Model of Place Field Reorganization During Reward Maximization (ICML 2025 · 3 citations)
Add layer normalization to the criticAcrobot Swingup (image-based) · final performance172.9±22.1 -> 87.6 ± 19.7HurtOverestimation, Overfitting, and Plasticity in Actor-Critic: the Bitter Lesson of Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
use pink noise exploration instead of deterministic or white noise explorationHumanoid · performance and learning stabilityHelpedTrust the Model Where It Trusts Itself - Model-Based Actor-Critic with Uncertainty-Aware Rollout Adaption (ICML 2024 · 2 citations)
replace cross-entropy with ordinal cross-entropyHopper, HalfCheetah, Walker2d, and Reacher under GCM perturbations · episodic return2198.8 -> 2677.5; 851.5 -> 2127.3; 1747.6 -> 2058.6; -12.2 -> -7.8HelpedThe Distributional Reward Critic Framework for Reinforcement Learning Under Perturbed Rewards (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Add online Q-function updatesSwimmer · evaluation rewardHelpedCoprocessor Actor Critic: A Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Approach For Adaptive Brain Stimulation (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Add expert trajectory regularization to the DRL policyAF dataset test, 2-step · exact prediction (= 0)0.029 -> 0.439HelpedStabilizing and Accelerating Autofocus with Expert Trajectory Regularized Deep Reinforcement Learning (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use 10 or 20 diffusion steps rather than 30Ant-v4 · performanceHelpedEfficient Online Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Policy (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
anneal τ from 0.9 rather than fix τ at 0.7DM Control, 3M steps · Mean730.7 -> 746.1HelpedGradual Transition from Bellman Optimality Operator to Bellman Operator in Online Reinforcement Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add the noisy label alignment rewardCIFAR100-IDN, noise 0.50 · test accuracy (%)72.0 -> 74.7HelpedLearning to Clean: Reinforcement Learning for Noisy Label Correction (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use standard SAC exploration instead of ε-greedy exploration200 million training regime · performanceHelpedCALE: Continuous Arcade Learning Environment (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • PPO · 3 of 8 papers
  • SAC · 3 of 8 papers
  • TD3 · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 27 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy