AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

Variational Bayesian deep learning

Parameterizes and analyzes variational posteriors for deep models, linking ensembles to Bayesian inference.

105 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Uncertainty and Gaussian processes, keyword cluster “bayesian inference · posterior · priors”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

23 papers in 2023–24 and 21 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.5% to 6.8%.

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (accuracy, last in 2024); Boston (Test RMSE, last in 2020); CIFAR-100 (accuracy, last in 2024); Concrete (Test RMSE, last in 2020); Kin8nm (Test RMSE, last in 2020).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 4172018: 9182019: 13192020: 14202021: 9212022: 9222023: 10232024: 13242025: 11252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 86.112022: 96.5
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202186.11Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning (ICML 2021 · 11 citations)
202296.5Feature Space Particle Inference for Neural Network Ensembles (ICML 2022 · 0 citations)

Boston · Test RMSE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2018–2020 · not reported since 2020

2018: 2.7422019: 2.369
20182020
YearBest so farSet by
20182.742Noisy Natural Gradient as Variational Inference (ICML 2018 · 25 citations)
20192.369Dropout as a Structured Shrinkage Prior (ICML 2019 · 23 citations)

CIFAR-10 · NLL (lower is better)

4 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 0.1232022: 0.107
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
20190.123A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learning (NeurIPS 2019 · 173 citations)
20220.107Feature Space Particle Inference for Neural Network Ensembles (ICML 2022 · 0 citations)

CIFAR-100 · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2022–2024 · not reported since 2024

2022: 82.9
20222024
YearBest so farSet by
202282.9Feature Space Particle Inference for Neural Network Ensembles (ICML 2022 · 0 citations)

Concrete · Test RMSE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2018–2020 · not reported since 2020

2018: 5.0192019: 3.935
20182020
YearBest so farSet by
20185.019Noisy Natural Gradient as Variational Inference (ICML 2018 · 25 citations)
20193.935Dropout as a Structured Shrinkage Prior (ICML 2019 · 23 citations)

Kin8nm · Test RMSE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2018–2020 · not reported since 2020

2018: 0.076
20182020
YearBest so farSet by
20180.076Noisy Natural Gradient as Variational Inference (ICML 2018 · 25 citations)

What has been tried

90 papers here report 867 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 21%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add a D-VBLL post-training layer to a trained DNNCIFAR-10 · accuracy95.8 ± 0.19 -> 96.4 ± 0.01No clear effectVariational Bayesian Last Layers (ICLR 2024 · 6 citations)
Initialize permutation candidates using SLR instead of random initializationAbalone (K=8) · convergence speedHelpedShuffled Deep Regression (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
Use linearized Hessian or linearized empirical Fisher instead of Monte Carlo approximationsMNIST · NLPDHelpedBayesian Online Natural Gradient (BONG) (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use different dictionaries rather than the db4 dictionaryMNIST · nMSENo clear effectSparse Bayesian Generative Modeling for Compressive Sensing (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use squared rather than linear confidence to set observation covarianceLaSOT airplane test videos · IoUHelpedDeep Bayesian Filter for Bayes-Faithful Data Assimilation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use multiple particles (FHBI 4p) instead of single particle SAMVTAB-1K Natural datasets · Top-1 accuracy (CIFAR100)74.8 vs 72.7HelpedImproving Generalization with Flat Hilbert Bayesian Inference (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Jointly optimize a learned embedding instead of fixing the embedding to identityCurved-manifold benchmarks, especially tail adjustments and anisotropic distortions · powerHelpedCoLT: The conditional localization test for assessing the accuracy of neural posterior estimates (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
increase the mixture size to N=202D Gaussian-mixture target · KLHelpedVariational Inference with Mixtures of Isotropic Gaussians (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use full VIKING ELBO optimization rather than post-hoc tuning of variational parameters onlyFashion MNIST · accuracyHelpedVIKING: Deep variational inference with stochastic projections (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Condition primarily on previous base noise instead of previous latentsFunnel · negative ELBO0.01 -> 0.38HurtModel-Informed Flows for Bayesian Inference (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove MILE's proposed numerical-stability adjustments and use naive MCLMCAirfoil · NaN chains (%)0% -> 86%HurtMicrocanonical Langevin Ensembles: Advancing the Sampling of Bayesian Neural Networks (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace moment-matching with local linearisationMNIST · accuracy0.949 -> 0.976HelpedStreamlining Prediction in Bayesian Deep Learning (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 19 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 5 of 19 papers
  • Fashion-MNIST · 3 of 19 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 3 of 19 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 3 of 19 papers
  • Ionosphere · 2 of 19 papers

Baselines

  • AdamW · 2 of 19 papers
  • SGLD · 2 of 19 papers
  • SVGD · 2 of 19 papers
  • MAP · 2 of 19 papers
  • IVON · 2 of 19 papers
  • SWAG · 2 of 19 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 44 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy