AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

PAC-Bayes and decoupled GP learning

Learns Gaussian processes via decoupled variational bases, PAC-Bayes bounds and random projections.

83 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Uncertainty and Gaussian processes, keyword cluster “gaussian processes · gp · kernel”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 5.9% to 5.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 5172018: 10182019: 3192020: 12202021: 7212022: 9222023: 10232024: 6242025: 11252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

70 papers here report 657 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 61%, no clear effect 14%, hurt 19%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase the inducing-point countArticle, rank 10 · RMSEHurtEfficient Nonparametric Tensor Decomposition for Binary and Count Data (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Use the forward relevance-pursuit variant instead of the backward variantRegression with few outliers · performanceHelpedRobust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Increase the information set threshold from ¯I = 4 to ¯I = 10KIN40K · SMSEHelpedAsynchronous Distributed Gaussian Process Regression (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Use the asymmetric e+r SVGP pair rather than a single-branch pairingCoLA · MCC28.71 -> 29.31; 28.10 -> 29.31HelpedSelf-Attention through Kernel-Eigen Pair Sparse Variational Gaussian Processes (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove the shrinkage termSynthetic dataset with 10% uniformly generated outliers · predictive posterior meanHurtRobust and Conjugate Gaussian Process Regression (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Use finer summarized-data gridsCalifornia housing, MedInc, Laplacian covariance · normalized posterior-mean RMSE0.57 ± 0.04 -> 0.32 ± 0.05HurtLearning from Summarized Data: Gaussian Process Regression with Sample Quasi-Likelihood (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
replace the subspace preconditioner with the identity matrixlarge-scale regression datasets · RMSE0.795 -> 0.808 (yolanda); 0.752 -> 0.782 (song); 0.012 -> 0.168 (benzene); 0.015 -> 0.231 (malonaldehyde); 0.789 -> 0.79HurtTurbocharging Gaussian Process Inference with Approximate Sketch-and-Project (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
increase latent dimension from 128 to 256AOD · RMSEHelpedSTACI: Spatio-Temporal Aleatoric Conformal Inference (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Set soft-threshold quantile parameter ε to 0.1 or 0.15UCI regression · MAE and NLLHelpedRobust and Computation-Aware Gaussian Processes (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use deep ensembles instead of variational inference for uncertainty quantificationSynthetic MSS interpolation · CRPS0.071 ± 0.019 -> 0.046 ± 0.005HelpedDeep Random Features for Scalable Interpolation of Spatiotemporal Data (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use an amortization grid that is too small (N = 5)Surface reconstruction · reconstruction fidelityHurtStochastic Poisson Surface Reconstruction with One Solve using Geometric Gaussian Processes (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 13 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • SARCOS · 2 of 13 papers

Baselines

  • SVGP · 4 of 13 papers
  • CaGP · 2 of 13 papers
  • GPSat · 2 of 13 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 34 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy