atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

CoLT: The conditional localization test for assessing the accuracy of neural posterior estimates

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Uncertainty and Gaussian processes · approach: Variational Bayesian deep learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CoLT, a conditional localization test that trains a localization function and embedding to find regions where a neural posterior deviates from the true posterior, using a single true draw per condition and a ball-probability rank statistic.

Problem

Validating whether a neural posterior estimate q(theta|x) accurately approximates the true posterior p(theta|x) across all conditioning inputs, when only one true draw per x is available.

Approach

Learn a localization function theta_l(x) and a metric embedding phi that maximally distort the ball probability rank statistic away from uniformity; the rank statistic is uniform iff p=q, giving a necessary-and-sufficient test and an IPM (ACLD) distance.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use CoLT Full instead of C2STTree toy example, α = 1.5 · Tree toy example, α = 1.5power: 0.000 -> 0.877Helped
Use CoLT Full instead of C2STTree toy example, α = 4.0 · Tree toy example, α = 4.0power: 0.065 -> 1.000Helped
Jointly optimize a learned embedding instead of fixing the embedding to identity (ablation)CoLT · Curved-manifold benchmarks, especially tail adjustments and anisotropic distortionspowerHelped
Fix the embedding to identity instead of learning it (ablation)CoLT · Gaussian benchmarks, including covariance scaling and additional modespowerNo clear effect
Reduce the number of reverse diffusion steps from 20Diffusion posterior approximation · Diffusion benchmarktest statisticHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NPTBench benchmark tasks (perturbed Gaussian and curved manifold posteriors) tree-shaped GMM toy posterior from EDM2 code diffusion benchmark theta=(x cos x, x sin x)

Benchmarks: NPTBench perturbed Gaussian tasks (mean shift, covariance scaling, anisotropic, t-tail, additional modes, mode collapse, NPTBench curved manifold tasks tree toy example

Metrics: statistical power vs perturbation alpha type I error at alpha=0

Baselines: C2ST SBC TARP

Builds on: classifier two-sample test simulation-based calibration TARP EDM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy