atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

Variational Inference with Mixtures of Isotropic Gaussians

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Uncertainty and Gaussian processes · approach: Variational Bayesian deep learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes variational inference over uniform-weight mixtures of isotropic Gaussians, optimizing component means by gradient descent and variances by Bures-Wasserstein or entropic mirror descent updates.

Problem

Gaussian VI with full-covariance mixtures is memory- and compute-heavy in high dimension, while single Gaussians cannot capture multimodal posteriors; normalizing flows suffer mode collapse.

Approach

Restrict the mixture family to equally weighted isotropic Gaussians (one variance per component) and derive explicit updates: gradient descent on means, and either a Bures-Wasserstein (IBW) or entropic mirror descent (MD) step on each variance, which keeps variances positive and costs O(d) per component.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
increase the mixture size to N=20 (ablation)IBW and MD · 2D Gaussian-mixture targetKLHelped
allow each component to optimize its own variance instead of sharing one variance (ablation)IBW and MD · 2D Gaussian-mixture targetKLHelped
use normalizing flows instead of the proposed methods2D Gaussian-mixture target · 2D Gaussian-mixture targetspeedHurt
use normalizing flows instead of the proposed methods2D Gaussian-mixture target · 2D Gaussian-mixture targetKLNo clear effect
use NGD with mean updates rescaled by the varianceNGD · High-dimensional Gaussian-mixture targetconvergence speedHelped
use NGD with mean updates rescaled by the varianceNGD · High-dimensional Gaussian-mixture targetsensitivity to initializationHurt
use isotropic rather than full covariance matricesIBW versus BW · High-dimensional Gaussian-mixture targettime per iterationHelped
use isotropic rather than full covariance matricesIBW versus BW · High-dimensional Gaussian-mixture targetKLHurt
use IBW or MD instead of NGDBayesian inference methods · MNIST BNN posteriorvariance positivityHelped
use IBW or MDBayesian inference methods · MNIST BNN posteriorperformanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: UCI breast_cancer UCI wine boston housing MNIST

Benchmarks: 2D Gaussian mixture target 20D Gaussian mixture target Bayesian logistic regression Bayesian neural network regression MNIST Bayesian neural network

Metrics: KL divergence test accuracy test RMSE time per iteration

Baselines: BW (full-covariance Bures-Wasserstein) GD (shared-variance mean-only gradient descent) NGD (natural gradient descent for mixtures) Real NVP normalizing flow HMC ADVI Diagonal and K-FAC Laplace approximations

Builds on: Bures-Wasserstein gradient descent on Gaussians JKO scheme entropic mirror descent natural gradient VI for Gaussian mixtures Wasserstein gradient flow for Gaussian mixtures

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy