AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

Priors and functional variational uncertainty

Builds expressive priors, depth-based and functional variational methods for uncertainty estimation.

112 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Uncertainty and Gaussian processes, keyword cluster “uncertainty estimation · epistemic · quantification”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

35 papers in 2023–24 and 41 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 12.9% to 13.3%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 0172018: 4182019: 4192020: 10202021: 6212022: 10222023: 18232024: 17242025: 14252026: 2726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

79 papers here report 750 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 18%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use 6 instead of 4 mixture componentsINTERACTION val · minFDE60.5362 -> 0.4306HelpedQuantifying Uncertainty in Motion Prediction with Variational Bayesian Mixture (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Use the reparameterization-based Hessian estimator instead of squared-gradient estimationCIFAR-10, ResNet-20 · accuracy88.81 ± 0.31 -> 92.64 ± 0.13HelpedVariational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networks (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Add the structure kernelProteinGym substitution, Avg. (174 assays) · Spearman-0.065HelpedKermut: Composite kernel regression for protein variant effects (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
add the neural process modelML-100K · HR@1015.49 -> 22.75HelpedAuto Encoding Neural Process for Multi-interest Recommendation (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
remove bi-Lipschitz regularizationCIFAR-10 ID vs CIFAR-100 OOD classification · ECE0.011±0.002 -> 0.042±0.001HurtDistance-informed Neural Processes (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Add gradient-based shape refinement during Bayesian optimizationAirfoil optimization · optimized lift-to-drag ratioHelpedEnabling Uncertainty Estimation in Iterative Neural Networks (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
remove 1-Lipschitz regularizationCIFAR-10-C defocus_blur_5 · accuracy91.2% -> 78.6%HurtDensity-Softmax: Efficient Test-time Model for Uncertainty Estimation and Robustness under Distribution Shifts (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Select inner points using K-means centroids rather than random samplingFashionMNIST vs MNIST, 500 examples/class · AUROC0.9368 -> 0.9543HelpedCombining Statistical Depth and Fermat Distance for Uncertainty Quantification (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Model accuracy and BART scores jointly with PTF rather than separately with PMFPerformance matrix, test ratio 20%, overall · RMSE0.175 -> 0.205HurtCan We Predict Performance of Large Models across Vision-Language Tasks? (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use full-rank isotropic Gaussian noise instead of low-rank isotropic noiseWG-S · accuracy (%)77.72 -> 75.57HurtTraining-Free Bayesianization for Low-Rank Adapters of Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase PIA J from 10 to 100CIFAR100 vs SVHN · AUROC78.81± 1.87 -> 80.55± 1.99HelpedCredal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation in Classification (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Neglect non-existing edges in the modeled data-generating processCSBM synthetic graphs · AUCHurtUncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 18 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 18 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 18 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 76 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy