AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes

Regression uncertainty quantification

Estimates predictive uncertainty for deep and high-dimensional regression.

43 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Uncertainty and Gaussian processes, keyword cluster “conformal · intervals · prediction”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

11 papers in 2023–24 and 17 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.0% to 5.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 1182019: 2192020: 3202021: 3212022: 5222023: 4232024: 7242025: 9252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

34 papers here report 296 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 24%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use δ=0.1 and P=1 rather than δ=0.00001 and P=100CIFAR-10 · test error1.50 ± 0.48 -> 6.25 ± 0.43HurtRobust Uncertainty Quantification Using Conformalised Monte Carlo Prediction (AAAI 2024 · 23 citations)
Add noise-scaling reparametrization of the score functionProbabilistic prediction on real-world datasets · accuracy and stabilityHelpedTreeffuser: probabilistic prediction via conditional diffusions with gradient-boosted trees (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Use the Gaussian kernel rather than the Laplace kernelTargeted GP sampling · information from points outside the target spaceMixedTransductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add MCD prediction-error resampling to propagate epistemic uncertaintyProtein · median MAE0.186±0.008 -> 0.202±0.009HelpedUncertainty Quantification for Deep Regression using Contextualised Normalizing Flows (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Set dropout rate p=0Asymptotic relative efficiency vs. vanilla Boulevard · ARE∈ [1,4]HurtStatistical Inference for Gradient Boosting Regression (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Vary L from 0.1 to 10Single covariate simulation · coveragecoverage of 1.0 for all L valuesNo clear effectSmooth Sailing: Lipschitz-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Spatial Associations (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
use a p-dependent IQT update instead of a p-independent updateAmazon stock prices, AR, infrequent observations · prediction interval sizeMixedConformalized Interactive Imitation Learning: Handling Expert Shift and Intermittent Feedback (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 11 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Fashion-MNIST · 2 of 11 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 11 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 11 papers

Baselines

  • XGBoost · 2 of 11 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 28 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy