AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

Diffusion for molecular conformations

Generates 3D conformers using gradient fields, geometric diffusion and neural dynamics.

67 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2020–2026) · an approach in Molecules and proteins, keyword cluster “molecules · drug · chemical”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

19 papers in 2023–24 and 37 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 3.9% to 4.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 1202021: 5212022: 5222023: 10232024: 9242025: 14252026: 2326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

40 papers here report 405 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 65%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 25%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add amino-acid and sequence-position embeddings to the atom encodingUnseen dipeptides · ESS0.58±1.04\% -> 15.29±9.27\%HelpedTransferable Boltzmann Generators (NeurIPS 2024 · 11 citations)
remove atom featuresGEOM-QM9 · Precision AMR mean0.103 -> 0.187HurtSwallowing the Bitter Pill: Simplified Scalable Conformer Generation (ICML 2024 · 8 citations)
replace discretised basis charge with continuous basis chargeQM9 · molecule stability90.87 -> 89.94HurtUnified Generative Modeling of 3D Molecules with Bayesian Flow Networks (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
add stochastic samplingGEOM-DRUGS · Precision Coverage mean74.38 -> 75.19HelpedET-Flow: Equivariant Flow-Matching for Molecular Conformer Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
add equivariant optimal transportQM9 test · % < RMSD 0.25 Å15.17±0.31 -> 13.99±0.30HurtStiefel Flow Matching for Moment-Constrained Structure Elucidation (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
Select training conformations with GOLF data-collecting scheme vs training on MMFF-optimized conformations (rdkit)nablaDFT test · pct_T / pct_successpct_T 98.8 vs 93.0; success 77.3 vs 35.4 (GOLF-10k vs rdkit)HelpedGradual Optimization Learning for Conformational Energy Minimization (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Replace Q-MPNN with PointNet++ in the routerATLAS test (All) · IoU0.7028±0.0390 -> 0.6656HurtGeneralized Implicit Neural Representations for Dynamic Molecular Surface Modeling (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
replace E3WAE with FactorVAE-style E3fVAEGEOM-Drugs Asphericity · MSE0.095 -> 0.143HurtLearning Disentangled Equivariant Representation for Explicitly Controllable 3D Molecule Generation (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Add MAE loss to RMSD-only trainingMolecule3D (random) validation · C-RMSD0.716 -> 0.662HelpedWGFormer: An SE(3)-Transformer Driven by Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Molecular Ground-State Conformation Prediction (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use JAMUN instead of full diffusion sampling with the same architectureTimewarp 2AA · JSD-Backbone Torsions0.1501 vs 0.1363 (3149 samples); 0.0496 vs 0.0460 (200000 samples)MixedJAMUN: Bridging Smoothed Molecular Dynamics and Score-Based Learning for Conformational Ensemble Generation (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add OrbDiff_WN to DiffCSPPerov-5 · Match52.02 -> 52.39HelpedRao-Blackwell Gradient Estimators for Equivariant Denoising Diffusion (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use subtractive rather than additive anisotropic correctionMD17 Aspirin · force MAE0.1128 -> 0.1118HelpedLearning 3D Anisotropic Noise Distributions Improves Molecular Force Fields (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 22 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • GEOM-Drugs · 6 of 22 papers
  • QM9 · 6 of 22 papers
  • ATLAS · 2 of 22 papers
  • GEOM-QM9 · 2 of 22 papers

Baselines

  • EDM · 2 of 22 papers
  • GeoDiff · 2 of 22 papers
  • FoldFlow-OT · 2 of 22 papers
  • GeoMol · 2 of 22 papers
  • MCF · 2 of 22 papers
  • ETFlow · 2 of 22 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 56 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy