atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

ET-Flow: Equivariant Flow-Matching for Molecular Conformer Generation

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Diffusion for molecular conformations · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ET-Flow, an SE(3)-style equivariant transformer (TorchMD-NET based) trained with conditional flow matching from a harmonic prior with Kabsch alignment, generating all-atom molecular conformers on GEOM-DRUGS and GEOM-QM9.

Problem

Generating low-energy 3D molecular conformers from molecular graphs accurately, efficiently and with physical validity, without relying on RDKit-generated initial structures or large transformer models.

Approach

Combine an equivariant transformer operating on all-atom coordinates with flow matching, a harmonic prior encoding bonded-atom proximity, and RMSD (Kabsch) alignment of prior samples to data to shorten transport paths; add stochastic sampling and a post-hoc chirality correction.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use ET-Flow instead of MCF-LGEOM-DRUGS conformer generation · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 66.8 -> 74.38Helped
use ET-Flow instead of MCF-LGEOM-DRUGS conformer generation · GEOM-DRUGSRecall Coverage mean: 84.7 -> 79.53Hurt
use ET-Flow instead of MCFGEOM-QM9 conformer generation · GEOM-QM9Recall AMR mean: 0.103 -> 0.073Helped
add stochastic sampling (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 74.38 -> 75.19Helped
add stochastic sampling (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSRecall Coverage mean: 79.53 -> 79.62No clear effect
replace post hoc chirality correction with SO(3) architecture (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 74.38 -> 67.27Hurt
remove post hoc chirality correction (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 58.90 -> 54.84Hurt
remove rotational alignment (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 58.90 -> 47.09Hurt
replace harmonic prior with Gaussian prior (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 58.90 -> 44.41Hurt
reduce inference steps from 50 to 5 (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSPrecision Coverage mean: 74.38 -> 74.03No clear effect
reduce inference steps from 50 to 5 (ablation)ET-Flow · GEOM-DRUGSRecall Coverage mean: 79.53 -> 77.84Hurt
use ET-Flow rather than MCFensemble property prediction · GEOM-DRUGSEnergy error: 0.68 -> 0.18Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GEOM-DRUGS GEOM-QM9 GEOM-XL

Benchmarks: GEOM-DRUGS GEOM-QM9 GEOM-XL

Metrics: Coverage AMR Average Minimum RMSD Energy error dipole moment error HOMO-LUMO gap error minimum energy error

Baselines: GeoMol GeoDiff Torsional Diffusion MCF CGCF OMEGA

Builds on: flow matching TorchMD-NET Torsional Diffusion GeoDiff

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy