AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Interventional causal discovery

Use interventional data and targeting strategies to learn causal graphs efficiently.

68 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Causal discovery, keyword cluster “causal discovery · causal structure · graphs”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 29 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 9.1% to 8.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 4192020: 5202021: 3212022: 5222023: 8232024: 13242025: 15252026: 1426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

48 papers here report 359 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 17%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add the proposed simplified acyclicity constraint to NOTEARS-MLPNonlinear models with additive Gaussian processes, d=50, 100, 200 · F1 scoreHurtMulti-Granularity Causal Structure Learning (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
add temporal causal discoveryACL18, CMIN-US, CMIN-CN · ACC51.08 vs 63.42; 51.48 vs 54.64; 51.37 vs 56.19HelpedCausalStock: Deep End-to-end Causal Discovery for News-driven Multi-stock Movement Prediction (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
finetune CDN on Perturb-seq data rather than train on synthetic data onlyPerturb-seq datasets, seen and unseen cell lines · rankHelpedIdentifying biological perturbation targets through causal differential networks (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Use MHSA + MHCA attention among samples rather than masked-MHSAMACE-TNP architecture experiments · NLPIDHelpedEstimating Interventional Distributions with Uncertain Causal Graphs through Meta-Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use a non-parametric CIT instead of a parametric CITSimulated graphs without cycles, no link assumptions · false positive rateHelpedCausal discovery with endogenous context variables (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Treat Z1 as latentSynthetic 18-node DAG · WCDE1.70 [1.66,1.75]HurtLocal Causal Discovery for Structural Evidence of Direct Discrimination (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove all first-order effects for nodes with multiple parents, retaining only the highest-order interactionSmall DAG simulation (d<10), ablated first-order effects · SHDNo clear effectDifferentiable Structure Learning and Causal Discovery for General Binary Data (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use OOCDM instead of OOFULL, which uses the full OOCGMouse o.o.d. · average instance log-likelihood-1.5e9 ± 3.0e9 -> 11.2 ± 17.2HelpedLearning Causal Dynamics Models in Object-Oriented Environments (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
lower the cutoff ratio from 0.30 to 0.01Protein Signaling · Jaccard similarity0.00 -> 0.07HelpedLearning Mixtures of Unknown Causal Interventions (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Add multi-step optimizationBivariate causal discovery, Setting-1 and Setting-2 · performanceHelpedBayesian Active Learning for Bivariate Causal Discovery (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 21 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Sachs · 3 of 21 papers
  • ANDES · 2 of 21 papers

Baselines

  • PC · 7 of 21 papers
  • NOTEARS · 4 of 21 papers
  • DCDI · 4 of 21 papers
  • DAGMA · 3 of 21 papers
  • AVICI · 3 of 21 papers
  • GIES · 3 of 21 papers
  • GES · 2 of 21 papers
  • LDECC · 2 of 21 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 50 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy