AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Identifiability with hidden confounders

Prove and exploit conditions for discovering causal structure under latent confounding and measurement error.

85 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Causal discovery, keyword cluster “causal discovery · causal structure · graphs”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 36 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 9.1% to 10.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 3182019: 3192020: 5202021: 2212022: 13222023: 6232024: 15242025: 17252026: 1926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

61 papers here report 451 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 15%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
vary the assumed delay distribution from exponential to other distributionsSynthetic data, distribution misspecification · F10.82; 0.81; 0.76; 0.75MixedCausal Discovery from Event Sequences by Local Cause-Effect Attribution (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Omit MINE-based independence enforcement for exogenous variablesImage data · final outputNo clear effectDifferentiable Causal Discovery for Latent Hierarchical Causal Models (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add symmetric CI post-processing to symmetric CI discoveryCausal discovery, d=3 · SHD (× 10^2)57 ± 84 -> 13 ± 4HelpedSignature Kernel Conditional Independence Tests in Causal Discovery for Stochastic Processes (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use IDI's in-distribution interventions rather than counterfactuals in step 2Synthetic RQ2 Non-Lin Invertible, multiple root causes · Recall@10.77 -> 0.83HelpedRobust Root Cause Diagnosis using In-Distribution Interventions (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace fixed median-heuristic kernel bandwidth with trainable kernel parameters while retaining conditional likelihoodToy example · Causal discovery accuracyHurtOptimal Kernel Choice for Score Function-based Causal Discovery (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Increase bin number and sample sizeSynthetic data, confounding and mediation settings · type I error rateHelpedCausal Discovery via Conditional Independence Testing with Proxy Variables (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Sachs flow cytometry dataset · 2 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • KCI · 3 of 27 papers
  • PC · 3 of 27 papers
  • CAM · 3 of 27 papers
  • FCI · 2 of 27 papers
  • NOTEARS · 2 of 27 papers
  • NOGAM · 2 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 57 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy