AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Causal discovery

Differentiable and score-based DAG learning

Learn causal DAGs by continuous optimization, reinforcement learning, or noise-model assumptions.

52 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Causal discovery, keyword cluster “causal discovery · causal structure · graphs”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 20 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.3% to 6.0%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 2182019: 2192020: 5202021: 3212022: 1222023: 9232024: 8242025: 9252026: 1126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

31 papers here report 278 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 60%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 20%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove stage 1 edge preselectionCausal discovery simulations · convergence speedHurtStable Differentiable Causal Discovery (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)
Use MCP or SCAD instead of quasi-MCPGaussian DAG models · Recovery of minimal equivalence classNo clear effectMarkov Equivalence and Consistency in Differentiable Structure Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use binary-masked path loss instead of intuitive relaxed path lossSynthetic datasets · F1HelpedDifferentiable Structure Learning with Ancestral Constraints (ICML 2025)
Use a soft mask instead of a binary hard maskK562 CAGE · MSE0.1863 -> 0.1856HelpedLearning to Discover Regulatory Elements for Gene Expression Prediction (ICLR 2025)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
GraN-DAGSachsSHD13 – 162 papers, e.g. AAAI 2024 and AAAI 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 13 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Sachs flow cytometry · 2 of 13 papers

Baselines

  • GOLEM · 3 of 13 papers
  • NOTEARS · 2 of 13 papers
  • DAGMA · 2 of 13 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 37 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy