AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

Scene flow and dynamic point clouds

Estimate motion and process sequences of dynamic point clouds.

89 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Point cloud classification, keyword cluster “motion · estimation · scene”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 26 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 12.5% to 10.0%.

No longer reported by papers here: KITTI_o (EPE, last in 2023); KITTI_t (EPE, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 3192020: 4202021: 11212022: 16222023: 16232024: 13242025: 15252026: 1126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ScanNet · PSNR (higher is better)

6 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 22.812022: 30.32
20202025
YearBest so farSet by
202022.81Neural Point Cloud Rendering via Multi-Plane Projection (CVPR 2020 · 82 citations)
202230.32Point-NeRF: Point-Based Neural Radiance Fields (CVPR 2022 · 561 citations)

KITTI_o · EPE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2021–2023 · not reported since 2023

2021: 0.1052022: 0.1022023: 0.047
20212023

KITTI_t · EPE (lower is better)

4 papers, 2021–2023 · not reported since 2023

2021: 0.0722023: 0.039
20212023

ScanNet · LPIPS (lower is better)

4 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 0.234
20202025
YearBest so farSet by
20200.234Neural Point Cloud Rendering via Multi-Plane Projection (CVPR 2020 · 82 citations)

ScanNet · SSIM (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 0.835
20202025
YearBest so farSet by
20200.835Neural Point Cloud Rendering via Multi-Plane Projection (CVPR 2020 · 82 citations)

What has been tried

77 papers here report 827 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 80%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 14%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use Latent Rendering rather than no forecasting pre-trainingnuScenes 3D detection · NDS (%)44.11 -> 47.58HelpedVisual Point Cloud Forecasting enables Scalable Autonomous Driving (CVPR 2024 · 51 citations)
replace the uniform grouping scheme with Uneven Eight groupingLossless point cloud compression · CR gain0.0% -> -1.8%HelpedUniPCGC: Towards Practical Point Cloud Geometry Compression via an Efficient Unified Approach (AAAI 2025 · 26 citations)
add explicit IFMP to DAE-MLoot, QP 51 · ΔPSNR (dB)0.41 -> 0.52HelpedFast Inter-frame Motion Prediction for Compressed Dynamic Point Cloud Attribute Enhancement (AAAI 2024 · 26 citations)
Use AdaDPCC coarse-to-fine inter-frame prediction instead of 3DAWISoldier · encoding time8.8% of the time needed by 3DAWIHelpedAdaDPCC: Adaptive Rate Control and Rate-Distortion-Complexity Optimization for Dynamic Point Cloud Compression (AAAI 2025 · 22 citations)
Add Intra-frame Spatial Mamba and Inter-frame Temporal MambaMSR-Action3D · accuracy90.94 -> 92.68HelpedMamba4D: Efficient 4D Point Cloud Video Understanding with Disentangled Spatial-Temporal State Space Models (CVPR 2025 · 19 citations)
Replace the lip point-cloud hash grid with a GNNHead reconstruction · PSNR32.704 -> 31.011HurtPointTalk: Audio-Driven Dynamic Lip Point Cloud for 3D Gaussian-based Talking Head Synthesis (AAAI 2025 · 15 citations)
Add LeCE8iVFB · BPP0.626 -> 0.592; −5.43%HelpedTopNet: Transformer-Efficient Occupancy Prediction Network for Octree-Structured Point Cloud Geometry Compression (CVPR 2025 · 13 citations)
add the feature transfer moduleMPEG 8i average · CD0.15 -> 0.11HelpedpatchDPCC: A Patchwise Deep Compression Framework for Dynamic Point Clouds (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
use point cloud construction and fusion instead of random matrices and vectorsLLFF · quantitative outcomesHelpedDepth-Guided Robust and Fast Point Cloud Fusion NeRF for Sparse Input Views (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
add implicit fieldsIGPLAY SCSF · IoU47.0 -> 56.5; 9.5%HelpedSemantic Complete Scene Forecasting from a 4D Dynamic Point Cloud Sequence (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
replace direct rotation prediction from scratch with normal-guided rotationOmniObject3D validation split · PSNR25.8 -> 30.9HelpedGaussianPainter: Painting Point Cloud into 3D Gaussians with Normal Guidance (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Add 3D reference pointsShapeNet SRN Chairs · PSNR23.30 -> 23.45HelpedLeanGaussian: Breaking Pixel or Point Cloud Correspondence in Modeling 3D Gaussians (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
NeRFDTUPSNR28.97 – 31.032 papers, e.g. ICLR 2023 and AAAI 2023
NeRFNeRF-SyntheticPSNR31 – 33.072 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2023 and AAAI 2023

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 17 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ShapeNet · 3 of 17 papers
  • MVUB · 3 of 17 papers
  • 8iVFB · 2 of 17 papers
  • MSR-Action3D · 2 of 17 papers
  • HOI4D · 2 of 17 papers
  • ScanNet · 2 of 17 papers

Baselines

  • G-PCC · 3 of 17 papers
  • PCGCv2 · 2 of 17 papers
  • TriplaneGaussian · 2 of 17 papers
  • SparsePCGC · 2 of 17 papers
  • VoxelDNN · 2 of 17 papers
  • MsVoxelDNN · 2 of 17 papers
  • OctAttention · 2 of 17 papers
  • ECM-OPCC · 2 of 17 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 55 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy