AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

Point cloud detection and tracking

Apply point cloud networks to tracking, completion and anomaly detection tasks.

56 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Point cloud classification, keyword cluster “motion · estimation · scene”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 10.3% to 4.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 2172018: 3182019: 2192020: 2202021: 6212022: 4222023: 10232024: 14242025: 8252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

52 papers here report 507 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
exclude point clouds from MEMS LiDARsIntersection · detection performanceHelpedRCooper: A Real-world Large-scale Dataset for Roadside Cooperative Perception (CVPR 2024 · 58 citations)
add one decomposed orthogonal sparse completion convolution instead of noneSemanticKITTI val · mIoU12.1 -> 13.1HelpedSparseOcc: Rethinking Sparse Latent Representation for Vision-Based Semantic Occupancy Prediction (CVPR 2024 · 53 citations)
add top-view depthKITTI validation split · RMSE (mm)763.56 -> 755.14HelpedTri-Perspective View Decomposition for Geometry-Aware Depth Completion (CVPR 2024 · 42 citations)
add LSTM to the hierarchy-only modelIJRR random split, shape translation · T+R3.04 -> 2.77HelpedA Simple and Effective Point-based Network for Event Camera 6-DOFs Pose Relocalization (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
Downsample point cloud 4x instead of using original resolutionReal-IAD D³: connector housing-female, Hole · I-AUROC0.516 -> 0.500HurtReal-IAD D3: A Real-World 2D/Pseudo-3D/3D Dataset for Industrial Anomaly Detection (CVPR 2025 · 14 citations)
add the offset-direction loss LdirAnomaly-ShapeNet (15 categories ending in 0) · object-level AUC-ROC50.3 -> 84.2HelpedPO3AD: Predicting Point Offsets toward Better 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection (CVPR 2025 · 10 citations)
Use 2 template frames rather than 1KITTI All · Success70.1 -> 70.0No clear effectM3SOT: Multi-Frame, Multi-Field, Multi-Space 3D Single Object Tracking (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Increase the point grid from N=21 × 21 to N=41 × 41VIGOR same-area validation, known orientation · Mean localization error (m)2.50 -> 2.17HelpedFG^2: Fine-Grained Cross-View Localization by Fine-Grained Feature Matching (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)
Initialize 3DGS with the MASt3R dense point cloud and poses instead of sparse SfM points and posesMip-NeRF 360 · PSNR16.6 -> 15.9HurtSPARS3R: Semantic Prior Alignment and Regularization for Sparse 3D Reconstruction (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)
Add voxel-based ray samplingEnergy Landscape · geometric error (m)10.29 -> 10.05HelpedEfficient Privacy-Preserving Visual Localization Using 3D Ray Clouds (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Use SIFT scale and orientation rather than random scale and orientationHPatches viewpoint · Corner-warp AUC@5px13.5 -> 63.5HelpedNoisy One-point Homographies are Surprisingly Good (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Add neural amplitude representation instead of pixel-wise amplitude representation3µm depth range · CRB (nm)65.5 -> 50.5HelpedCodedEvents: Optimal Point-Spread-Function Engineering for 3D-Tracking with Event Cameras (CVPR 2024 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • M3DM · 2 of 8 papers
  • PatchCore · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 35 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy