AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Prediction and decision losses

Compact interpretable model classes

Learn small interpretable models such as diagrams, lattices and oblique trees.

26 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Prediction and decision losses, keyword cluster “trees · decision tree · forests”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

5 papers in 2023–24 and 4 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 0.9% to 0.7%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 5162017: 0172018: 0182019: 2192020: 1202021: 6212022: 3222023: 3232024: 2242025: 3252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

24 papers here report 205 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 56%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 27%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Set the regularization parameter to α=0 instead of α=∞ADNI · AUROCHelpedPrediction models that learn to avoid missing values (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use DiCE counterfactuals instead of OCEAN counterfactualsDecision trees and random forests · fidelityHelpedFrom Counterfactuals to Trees: Competitive Analysis of Model Extraction Attacks (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 6 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • FICO · 3 of 6 papers
  • COMPAS · 3 of 6 papers
  • German Credit · 2 of 6 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 9 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 25 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy