AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Margin-based face recognition losses

Shapes face embeddings with angular margins, adaptive margins and quality-aware losses.

124 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Recognition and long-tail, keyword cluster “face · person identification · facial”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

18 papers in 2023–24 and 9 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 1.4% to 0.7%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: LFW (accuracy, last in 2022); CFP-FP (accuracy, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 16162017: 9172018: 14182019: 15192020: 21202021: 12212022: 10222023: 8232024: 10242025: 6252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

LFW · verification accuracy (%) (higher is better)

13 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 99.462019: 99.832020: 99.85
20182025

LFW · accuracy (higher is better)

10 papers, 2016–2022 · not reported since 2022

2016: 99.52018: 99.732020: 99.752021: 99.82022: 99.83
20162022

CALFW · verification accuracy (%) (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 95.452020: 96.22025: 96.94
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201995.45ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2019 · 7,708 citations)
202096.2CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2020 · 590 citations)
202596.94GIF: Generative Inspiration for Face Recognition at Scale (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)

CPLFW · verification accuracy (%) (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 92.082020: 93.482025: 94.45
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201992.08ArcFace: Additive Angular Margin Loss for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2019 · 7,708 citations)
202093.48More Information Supervised Probabilistic Deep Face Embedding Learning (ICML 2020 · 3 citations)
202594.45GIF: Generative Inspiration for Face Recognition at Scale (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)

AgeDB · verification accuracy (%) (higher is better)

6 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 98.322021: 98.62025: 99.4
20202025
YearBest so farSet by
202098.32CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2020 · 590 citations)
202198.6Variational Prototype Learning for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2021 · 89 citations)
202599.4GIF: Generative Inspiration for Face Recognition at Scale (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)

CFP-FP · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2020–2022 · not reported since 2022

2020: 98.64
20202022
YearBest so farSet by
202098.64Towards Universal Representation Learning for Deep Face Recognition (CVPR 2020 · 165 citations)

What has been tried

119 papers here report 1,274 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 17%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add both soft co-annotation and distribution matchingAff-Wild2 · F1 (expression)0.337 -> 0.399HelpedDistribution Matching for Multi-Task Learning of Classification Tasks: A Large-Scale Study on Faces & Beyond (AAAI 2024 · 39 citations)
Add Maximal Connect quality assessmentGait3D · Rank-155.1 -> 55.8HelpedQAGait: Revisit Gait Recognition from a Quality Perspective (AAAI 2024 · 34 citations)
Add KP-RPEIJB-C unaligned · Verification TAR@0.01%21.62 -> 91.85HelpedKeyPoint Relative Position Encoding for Face Recognition (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
add SFAMPA100K · mA81.4 -> 82.9HelpedSelective and Orthogonal Feature Activation for Pedestrian Attribute Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 14 citations)
Add concept-matrix invariance instead of using feature-invariance aloneDSADS · accuracy (AVG)88.6 -> 90.7HelpedGeneralizable Sensor-Based Activity Recognition via Categorical Concept Invariant Learning (AAAI 2025 · 12 citations)
add RSP perturbations to ArcFace without PTSAIJB-C (1e-4), MS1MV2 · verification accuracy (%)92.52 -> 92.44HurtTopoFR: A Closer Look at Topology Alignment on Face Recognition (NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations)
Add person location guidance to attribute predictionVBD group activity retrieval · Hit@169.5 -> 84.8HelpedLearning Group Activity Features Through Person Attribute Prediction (CVPR 2024 · 5 citations)
replace the ICT generative encoder with a DeepFill CNN encoderSynthetic masked LFW UMR-MP · ACC97.75% -> 96.42%HurtMasked Face Recognition with Generative-to-Discriminative Representations (ICML 2024 · 5 citations)
Use a dynamic l range [-1,1] rather than static l=-1CASIA-B mean · Rank-1 accuracy94.4 -> 94.7HelpedWaveLoss: An Adaptive Dynamic Loss for Deep Gait Recognition (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
add differential core-template selection to average poolingIJB-B · TAR@FAR=1e-638.45 -> 48.01HelpedFaceCoresetNet: Differentiable Coresets for Face Set Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Replace the CLIP ResNet-50 visual encoder with a gait-specific DeepGaitV2-3D encoder and add Align and Fusion stagesRA-GAR · F171.48 -> 76.00HelpedRA-GAR: A Richly Annotated Benchmark for Gait Attribute Recognition (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Add explicit angular-regression embedding supervision (LAR) to code-prediction loss (LC)IJB-B · TAR@FAR=1e−4HelpedGIF: Generative Inspiration for Face Recognition at Scale (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • GaitSet · 2 of 7 papers
  • GaitGL · 2 of 7 papers
  • DeepGaitV2 · 2 of 7 papers
  • ArcFace · 2 of 7 papers
  • AdaFace · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 27 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy