AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Fair and quality-aware face recognition

Uses quality-adaptive margins, unified thresholds and fairness adapters in face recognition.

66 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Recognition and long-tail, keyword cluster “face · person identification · facial”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

7 papers in 2023–24 and 12 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 0.6% to 0.9%.

No longer reported by papers here: LFW (verification accuracy (%), last in 2021).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 3172018: 4182019: 7192020: 6202021: 11212022: 12222023: 5232024: 2242025: 7252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

LFW · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 99.712025: 99.79
20202025

LFW · verification accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2021 · not reported since 2021

2019: 99.622020: 99.82021: 99.83
20192021

What has been tried

60 papers here report 628 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 67%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 23%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add SCM-guided generated latent spoof features (LG)C → I · HTER30.79 -> 21.36HelpedOne-Class Face Anti-spoofing via Spoof Cue Map-Guided Feature Learning (CVPR 2024 · 21 citations)
Add SoftMoE to CLIPUniAttackData Protocol I · ACER (%)0.79 -> 0.66HelpedMixture-of-Attack-Experts with Class Regularization for Unified Physical-Digital Face Attack Detection (AAAI 2025 · 11 citations)
Inject public face attributes during patient face synthesisGenerated patient faces · average identity leakage percentage71.83% -> 1.27%HelpedMedical Manifestation-Aware De-Identification (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
Add Retina Patch and Semantic Attention Head to ViTFace Avg (CPLFW, CFPFP, CALFW, AGEDB) · accuracy90.63 -> 96.66HelpedSapiensID: Foundation for Human Recognition (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
add segmentation-based and patch-based regularizersThermalized FAKE vs SEJONG · FID.5028 -> .1598HelpedT-FAKE: Synthesizing Thermal Images for Facial Landmarking (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Set margin parameter m to 0.5 rather than 0.2VerifyMe easy pairs · performance (Table 5)73.42 -> 74.49HelpedAQUAFace: Age-Invariant Quality Adaptive Face Recognition for Unconstrained Selfie vs ID Verification (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
add proxy lossBTS 3.1 Face Included Treatment, selected experts bK=4 · TAR67.32 -> 68.93HelpedProxyFusion: Face Feature Aggregation Through Sparse Experts (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
replace the Register Module with Gaussian noise added to DINOv2 features during adaptationVFHQ Test · LPIPS0.2470 -> 0.2699HurtLow-Rank Head Avatar Personalization with Registers (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • LFW · 3 of 7 papers
  • CFP-FP · 2 of 7 papers
  • CPLFW · 2 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • AdaFace · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 19 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 34 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy