AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Multilingual language representation pretraining

Pretrains cross-lingual language models and augmentation for transferable text representations.

507 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Recognition and long-tail, keyword cluster “representations · transfer · unsupervised”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Leveling off Several papers from 2025–26 still report on 1 tracked benchmark, but the best result has barely moved since 2024.

110 papers in 2023–24 and 65 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.8% to 5.0%.

What looks settled

No longer reported by papers here: WMT14 En-De (BLEU, last in 2023); GENIA (F1, last in 2023); MSRA (F1, last in 2024); RTE (accuracy, last in 2024); Resume (F1, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 28162017: 27172018: 57182019: 57192020: 65202021: 62212022: 36222023: 69232024: 41242025: 34252026: 3126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

WMT14 En-De · BLEU (higher is better)

7 papers, 2019–2023 · not reported since 2023

2019: 27.732020: 30.752021: 31.74
20192023
YearBest so farSet by
201927.73Addressing the Under-Translation Problem from the Entropy Perspective (AAAI 2019 · 13 citations)
202030.75Incorporating BERT into Neural Machine Translation (ICLR 2020 · 170 citations)
202131.74On Learning Universal Representations Across Languages (ICLR 2021 · 65 citations)

GENIA · F1 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 79.82022: 81.392023: 82.09
20202023

MR · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2017–2025 · flat since 2024

2017: 81.062018: 82.5
20172025
YearBest so farSet by
201781.06Neural Bag-of-Ngrams (AAAI 2017 · 9 citations)
201882.5Learning General Purpose Distributed Sentence Representations via Large Scale Multi-task Learning (ICLR 2018 · 99 citations)

MSRA · F1 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 96.41
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202196.41Dynamic Modeling Cross- and Self-Lattice Attention Network for Chinese NER (AAAI 2021 · 28 citations)

RTE · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 72.62024: 85.9
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202172.6Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuning (ICLR 2021 · 210 citations)
202485.9Sparse is Enough in Fine-tuning Pre-trained Large Language Models (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)

Resume · F1 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 96.672023: 97.33
20212024

What has been tried

453 papers here report 4,928 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add CAT to the ITM head, without test-time fusionBase-to-new, 11-dataset average · H75.18 -> 76.63HelpedDePT: Decoupled Prompt Tuning (CVPR 2024 · 50 citations)
add semantic contrastive learningXTREME-Avg · F1HelpedMCL-NER: Cross-Lingual Named Entity Recognition via Multi-View Contrastive Learning (AAAI 2024 · 33 citations)
Use heterogeneous emotion, intensity, speaker, and audio nodes instead of omitting emotion nodesDailyTalk test · E-DMOS3.496 -> 3.619HelpedEmotion Rendering for Conversational Speech Synthesis with Heterogeneous Graph-Based Context Modeling (AAAI 2024 · 24 citations)
Add Syntax Distance WeightingRest.14 · Implicit accuracy2.62↓HelpedAspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Explicit Sentiment Augmentations (AAAI 2024 · 23 citations)
Use adaptive rather than fixed marginNISQA TEST FOR · PC0.96 -> 0.97No clear effectSCOREQ: Speech Quality Assessment with Contrastive Regression (NeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations)
add GAT to model the temporal dependencies of phoneme-level featuresInTheWild · EER (%)28.66 -> 16.07HelpedPhoneme-Level Feature Discrepancies: A Key to Detecting Sophisticated Speech Deepfakes (AAAI 2025 · 12 citations)
Add the information bottleneck moduleREST14 · accuracy85.54 -> 87.77HelpedCounterfactual-Enhanced Information Bottleneck for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
add quantum projection to ACSSemEval-2016 average (FR, SP, DU, RU) · F1-score53.23 -> 54.58HelpedQPEN: Quantum Projection and Quantum Entanglement Enhanced Network for Cross-Lingual Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
Add soft promptCoNLL03 shot-20 · F180.5 -> 81.9HelpedRoPDA: Robust Prompt-Based Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Add span enhancement with convolution-based n-gram featuresResume · F196.26 -> 96.86HelpedSENCR: A Span Enhanced Two-Stage Network with Counterfactual Rethinking for Chinese NER (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
Add multi-view word-sense representationsSE2 · F1-score79.4 -> 80.8HelpedQuantum Interference Model for Semantic Biases of Glosses in Word Sense Disambiguation (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
Add Ext-Doc objectiveCNNDM · R140.7 -> 40.9HelpedUnsupervised Extractive Summarization with Learnable Length Control Strategies (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 42 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • LibriSpeech · 3 of 42 papers
  • Twitter · 2 of 42 papers
  • MR · 2 of 42 papers
  • Snippets · 2 of 42 papers
  • VCTK · 2 of 42 papers

Baselines

  • BERT · 3 of 42 papers
  • BM25 · 3 of 42 papers
  • RoBERTa · 3 of 42 papers
  • GPT-3.5 · 2 of 42 papers
  • TF-IDF+SVM · 2 of 42 papers
  • PTE · 2 of 42 papers
  • CNN · 2 of 42 papers
  • LSTM · 2 of 42 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 175 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy