AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

Subgraph and distance-aware GNNs

Boost GNN expressivity with identity, distance encoding, and subgraph information.

46 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in GNN architectures, keyword cluster “wl · expressive · power”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

14 papers in 2023–24 and 12 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.0% to 2.4%.

No longer reported by papers here: PROTEINS (accuracy, last in 2024); NCI1 (accuracy, last in 2024); MUTAG (accuracy, last in 2024); IMDB-B (accuracy, last in 2024); D&D (accuracy, last in 2024); IMDB-M (accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 4192020: 2202021: 6212022: 8222023: 9232024: 5242025: 5252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

PROTEINS · accuracy (higher is better)

12 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 77.22024: 78.8
20192024
YearBest so farSet by
201977.2Provably Powerful Graph Networks (NeurIPS 2019 · 18 citations)
202478.8Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Paths: Learning Topological Features via Path Complexes (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)

NCI1 · accuracy (higher is better)

11 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 84.22024: 85.1
20192024

MUTAG · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 90.552021: 92.7
20192024
YearBest so farSet by
201990.55Provably Powerful Graph Networks (NeurIPS 2019 · 18 citations)
202192.7Weisfeiler and Lehman Go Cellular: CW Networks (NeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations)

IMDB-B · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 76.92024: 79.6
20192024

D&D · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2024 · not reported since 2024

2021: 77.82023: 78.01
20212024
YearBest so farSet by
202177.8Nested Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2021 · 32 citations)
202378.01Local Vertex Colouring Graph Neural Networks (ICML 2023 · 0 citations)

IMDB-M · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 52.82024: 56.53
20192024

What has been tried

35 papers here report 348 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 59%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 28%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use union subgraphs instead of overlap subgraphsMUTAG · accuracy85.70 ± 7.40 -> 87.31 ± 5.29HelpedUnion Subgraph Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
Increase maximum lifting dimension from 2 to 7ZINC · test MAE0.160 ± 0.009 -> 0.096 ± 0.006HelpedWeisfeiler and Lehman Go Paths: Learning Topological Features via Path Complexes (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
add positional encodingspeptides-func · AP0.7275±0.0066 -> 0.7311\boldsymbol{±}0.0066HelpedSpatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
add equivariant eigenvector update to EPNNMNIST Superpixel (k=3) · accuracy48.45 ± 1.2 % -> 60.95 ± 0.9 %HelpedSpectral Graph Neural Networks are Incomplete on Graphs with a Simple Spectrum (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
GraphSAGED&Daccuracy71.6 – 76.442 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2021 and NeurIPS 2024

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • GCN · 2 of 8 papers
  • GAT · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 26 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 35 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy