atlas

Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures

TextGT: A Double-View Graph Transformer on Text for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis

AAAI 2024 · Graph learning › GNN architectures · approach: Graph rewiring and scalable message passing · 49 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes TextGT, a double-view graph Transformer that alternates dense GIN-style graph convolution (TextGINConv) with Transformer layers for aspect-based sentiment analysis, reporting state-of-the-art accuracy on SemEval and Twitter benchmarks.

Problem

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (predicting aspect-level sentiment) with GNNs suffers from over-smoothing, and graph Transformers had not been explored for ABSA or tightly combined with sequence-view Transformers.

Approach

Alternate graph convolution layers (dense TextGINConv over dependency graphs with edge features) and Transformer layers in series within each block, with a middle LayerNorm+ReLU layer and skip connections, so the graph and sequence views are tightly coupled and over-smoothing is mitigated.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use TextGT+BERT instead of DualGCN+BERTABSA models · RestaurantAccuracy: 87.13 -> 87.31Helped
use TextGT+BERT instead of DualGCN+BERTABSA models · LaptopMicro-F1: 78.10 -> 78.71Helped
use TextGT+BERT instead of DGEDT+BERTABSA models · TwitterAccuracy: 77.90 -> 77.70Hurt
use TextGT+BERT instead of SSEGCN+BERTABSA models · TwitterMicro-F1: 76.36 -> 76.45Helped
use TextGT+BERT instead of Sentic GCN+BERTABSA models · Rest16Accuracy: 91.97 -> 92.21Helped
replace Transformer layers with TextGINConv (ablation)TextGT · Restaurant, Laptop, TwitterAccuracy: 85.17 -> 80.07; 78.64 -> 74.68; 76.51 -> 74.89Hurt
replace TextGINConv layers with Transformer layers (ablation)TextGT · Restaurant, Laptop, TwitterAccuracy: 85.17 -> 81.77; 78.64 -> 75.16; 76.51 -> 75.48Hurt
remove LayerNorm + ReLU middle layer (ablation)TextGT · Restaurant, Laptop, TwitterAccuracy: 85.17 -> 83.82; 78.64 -> 75.63; 76.51 -> 76.22Hurt
replace TextGINConv with TextGCNConv (ablation)TextGT · Restaurant, Laptop, TwitterAccuracy: 85.17 -> 83.56; 78.64 -> 77.37; 76.51 -> 75.33Hurt
replace TextGINConv with TextGATConv (ablation)TextGT · Restaurant, Laptop, TwitterAccuracy: 85.17 -> 82.13; 78.64 -> 75.63; 76.51 -> 75.78Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SemEval 2014 Restaurant SemEval 2014 Laptop SemEval 2016 Rest16 Twitter

Benchmarks: SemEval 2014 Restaurant SemEval 2014 Laptop Twitter SemEval 2016 Rest16

Metrics: accuracy micro-F1

Baselines: IAN RAM MGAN TNet ASGCN CDT BiGCN kumaGCN InterGCN R-GAT DualGCN DGEDT

Builds on: GINE GIN GraphGPS R-GAT DualGCN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy