AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Box regression and loss design

Improve localization with refined losses and anchor-free or rotated box formulations.

94 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in CNN features, keyword cluster “detectors · detr · search”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

21 papers in 2023–24 and 15 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 6.4% to 4.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: COCO minival (AP, last in 2023); COCO test-dev (AP, last in 2022); MS COCO test-dev (AP, last in 2024); DOTA (mAP, last in 2022); DOTA test (mAP, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 3172018: 3182019: 7192020: 14202021: 14212022: 15222023: 15232024: 6242025: 7252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

COCO minival · AP (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2023 · not reported since 2023

2019: 41.62020: 42.3
20192023
YearBest so farSet by
201941.6Feature Selective Anchor-Free Module for Single-Shot Object Detection (CVPR 2019 · 1,059 citations)
202042.3Learning From Noisy Anchors for One-Stage Object Detection (CVPR 2020 · 116 citations)

COCO test-dev · AP (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 44.62020: 48.92021: 50.62022: 55.5
20192022

MS COCO test-dev · AP (higher is better)

6 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 50.7
20202024

DOTA · mAP (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2022 · not reported since 2022

2021: 76.95
20212022
YearBest so farSet by
202176.95Dynamic Anchor Learning for Arbitrary-Oriented Object Detection (AAAI 2021 · 361 citations)

DOTA test · mAP (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 69.562021: 74.12022: 79.16
20192022
YearBest so farSet by
201969.56Learning RoI Transformer for Oriented Object Detection in Aerial Images (CVPR 2019 · 1,624 citations)
202174.1Learning Modulated Loss for Rotated Object Detection (AAAI 2021 · 320 citations)
202279.16Polygon-to-Polygon Distance Loss for Rotated Object Detection (AAAI 2022 · 43 citations)

What has been tried

81 papers here report 999 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
reduce inherent network redundancyVisDrone · AP23.6 -> 23.4HurtFBRT-YOLO: Faster and Better for Real-Time Aerial Image Detection (AAAI 2025 · 157 citations)
add GatedFFNVisDrone val · AP9519.1 -> 20.3; ↑ 1.2HelpedRemDet: Rethinking Efficient Model Design for UAV Object Detection (AAAI 2025 · 44 citations)
Use a longer encoding length for CSLHRSC2016 · AP752.56 -> 13.58 -> 61.43 -> 77.76HelpedRethinking Boundary Discontinuity Problem for Oriented Object Detection (CVPR 2024 · 42 citations)
Use IoU scores instead of one-hot coding for OBB classificationDOTA-v1.0 · mAP5073.46 -> 74.00HelpedTheoretically Achieving Continuous Representation of Oriented Bounding Boxes (CVPR 2024 · 31 citations)
Add CFCCOD10K · Fβ0.685 -> 0.747HelpedStrategic Preys Make Acute Predators: Enhancing Camouflaged Object Detectors by Generating Camouflaged Objects (ICLR 2024 · 29 citations)
Add group pooling to the ablation configuration without equivariance transformationsDOTA-v1.0 · mAP73.32 -> 73.91HelpedFRED: Towards a Full Rotation-Equivariance in Aerial Image Object Detection (AAAI 2024 · 26 citations)
add rotation-equivariant diffusion model (over DiffusionDet baseline)DIOR-R · AP50+2.24 (49.91 to 52.15)HelpedReDiffDet: Rotation-equivariant Diffusion Model for Oriented Object Detection (CVPR 2025 · 18 citations)
Add a semantic feature map to SRA mask regressionMS COCO val2017 · AP36.4 -> 38.2HelpedSemantic-Aware Transformation-Invariant RoI Align (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
integrate restoration learning and parameter-space smoothing into YOLOv10RTTS · mAP+3.2HelpedDelving into Cascaded Instability: A Lipschitz Continuity View on Image Restoration and Object Detection Synergy (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
vary M from 200 to 300 and N from 100 to 180YUD · AA@3°70.6 to 78.4; mean 75.3; STDEV 2.2No clear effectDiskVPS: Vanishing Point Detector via Hough Transform in a Disk Region (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
replace strict rotation-equivariant filters with relaxed rotation-equivariant filtersVOC test, C4 · AP50:9564.2 -> 65.1 (+0.9)HelpedR2Det: Exploring Relaxed Rotation Equivariance in 2D Object Detection (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
add prediction score to BoSVehicle detection, 10 unseen datasets · RMSE (%)2.25 ±0.13 -> 2.24 ±0.12No clear effectBounding Box Stability against Feature Dropout Reflects Detector Generalization across Environments (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
ATSSCOCO test-devAP43.6 – 47.72 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and NeurIPS 2020
Focal LossCOCO minivalAP33.9 – 36.12 papers, e.g. CVPR 2019 and CVPR 2020

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • VisDrone · 2 of 7 papers
  • UAVDT · 2 of 7 papers
  • DOTA v1.0 · 2 of 7 papers
  • DOTA v1.5 · 2 of 7 papers
  • COCO · 2 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • YOLOv8 · 4 of 7 papers
  • YOLOv10 · 4 of 7 papers
  • YOLOv9 · 2 of 7 papers
  • YOLOv5 · 2 of 7 papers
  • RT-DETR · 2 of 7 papers
  • QueryDet · 2 of 7 papers
  • CEASC · 2 of 7 papers
  • YOLC · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 36 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy